From: "Scott Thompson" <postfail@hushmail.com>
To: <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 5 ] /drivers/char ioremap balancing/ returncode check
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:35:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070815043503.535662281F@mailserver9.hushmail.com> (raw)
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:17:29 -0400 Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/sx.c b/drivers/char/sx.c
>> index 85a2328..30829ed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/sx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/sx.c
>> @@ -2627,6 +2627,12 @@ static void __devinit fix_sx_pci(struct
>> pci_dev *pdev, struct sx_board *board)
>> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, &hwbase);
>> hwbase &= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
>> rebase = ioremap(hwbase, 0x80);
>> + if (!rebase) {
>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG
>> + "sx:ioremap fail, unable to perform cntrl reg fix\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>
>1) this should be pci_iomap(pdev, 0, 0x80)
The ioremap call was there before my patch and I'm just trying to
audit ioremap calls to make sure that they are cleaned up and have
their return codes checked. If you want me to take care of that
"while I'm in the neighborhood", let me know, but trying to avoid
too much scope creep on my audit to increase chances it actually
gets included...
>2) KERN_DEBUG is inappropriate and wrap the string in the middle
>and not in the
>beginning
Agree on the wordwrap, several artifacts were created on this
patchset and this whole thing will be resubmitted through a
different mail client.
As for KERN_DEBUG, KERN_DEBUG is used in the function following
this call as notification that this workaround was required. When
I audit code as I am here I generally try to blend the patch in
with the style and conventions of the code around it. If
KERN_DEBUG is inappropriate on the subsequent call, both values
should be changed.
Let me know your preferences on these issues and I will include in
the next pass. Thanks for your comments and review...
---------------------------------------
Scott Thompson / postfail@hushmail.com
---------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-15 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-15 4:35 Scott Thompson [this message]
2007-08-15 19:36 ` Jiri Slaby
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-13 4:00 Scott Thompson
2007-08-13 20:17 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070815043503.535662281F@mailserver9.hushmail.com \
--to=postfail@hushmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome