mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] Re: accounting regression since rc1
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:17:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708161017.56971.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708141037.48001.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Ingo,

this patch fixes the accounting regression for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING. It 
reverts parts of commit b27f03d4bdc145a09fb7b0c0e004b29f1ee555fa by converting 
fs/proc/array.c back to cputime_t. The new functions task_utime and 
task_stime now return cputime_t instead of clock_t. If 
CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUTING is set, task->utime and task->stime are returned 
directly instead of using sum_exec_runtime. 

Patch is tested on s390x with and without VIRT_CPU_ACCOUTING as well as on 
i386. Not tested on ppc64 - Paul?

Feedback is welcome.

Signed-Off-By: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

---
 fs/proc/array.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/proc/array.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/proc/array.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -320,7 +320,18 @@ int proc_pid_status(struct task_struct *
 	return buffer - orig;
 }
 
-static clock_t task_utime(struct task_struct *p)
+#if defined(CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING)
+static cputime_t task_utime(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return p->utime;
+}
+
+static cputime_t task_stime(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return p->stime;
+}
+#else
+static cputime_t task_utime(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	clock_t utime = cputime_to_clock_t(p->utime),
 		total = utime + cputime_to_clock_t(p->stime);
@@ -337,10 +348,10 @@ static clock_t task_utime(struct task_st
 	}
 	utime = (clock_t)temp;
 
-	return utime;
+	return clock_t_to_cputime(utime);
 }
 
-static clock_t task_stime(struct task_struct *p)
+static cputime_t task_stime(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	clock_t stime;
 
@@ -349,10 +360,12 @@ static clock_t task_stime(struct task_st
 	 * the total, to make sure the total observed by userspace
 	 * grows monotonically - apps rely on that):
 	 */
-	stime = nsec_to_clock_t(p->se.sum_exec_runtime) - task_utime(p);
+	stime = nsec_to_clock_t(p->se.sum_exec_runtime) -
+			cputime_to_clock_t(task_utime(p));
 
-	return stime;
+	return clock_t_to_cputime(stime);
 }
+#endif
 
 static int do_task_stat(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer, int whole)
 {
@@ -368,8 +381,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct task_stru
 	unsigned long long start_time;
 	unsigned long cmin_flt = 0, cmaj_flt = 0;
 	unsigned long  min_flt = 0,  maj_flt = 0;
-	cputime_t cutime, cstime;
-	clock_t utime, stime;
+	cputime_t cutime, cstime, utime, stime;
 	unsigned long rsslim = 0;
 	char tcomm[sizeof(task->comm)];
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -387,8 +399,7 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct task_stru
 
 	sigemptyset(&sigign);
 	sigemptyset(&sigcatch);
-	cutime = cstime = cputime_zero;
-	utime = stime = 0;
+	cutime = cstime = utime = stime = cputime_zero;
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) {
@@ -414,15 +425,15 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct task_stru
 			do {
 				min_flt += t->min_flt;
 				maj_flt += t->maj_flt;
-				utime += task_utime(t);
-				stime += task_stime(t);
+				utime = cputime_add(utime, task_utime(t));
+				stime = cputime_add(stime, task_stime(t));
 				t = next_thread(t);
 			} while (t != task);
 
 			min_flt += sig->min_flt;
 			maj_flt += sig->maj_flt;
-			utime += cputime_to_clock_t(sig->utime);
-			stime += cputime_to_clock_t(sig->stime);
+			utime = cputime_add(utime, sig->utime);
+			stime = cputime_add(stime, sig->stime);
 		}
 
 		sid = signal_session(sig);
@@ -471,8 +482,8 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct task_stru
 		cmin_flt,
 		maj_flt,
 		cmaj_flt,
-		utime,
-		stime,
+		cputime_to_clock_t(utime),
+		cputime_to_clock_t(stime),
 		cputime_to_clock_t(cutime),
 		cputime_to_clock_t(cstime),
 		priority,

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-16  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-12 16:32 [git pull request] scheduler updates Ingo Molnar
2007-08-14  8:37 ` [accounting regression since rc1] " Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-16  8:17   ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2007-08-20 15:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-20 17:03     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-08-20 18:08       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-20 18:33         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-08-20 19:00           ` Balbir Singh
2007-08-20 19:05           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21  7:20             ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-20 19:12           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21  7:00           ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-21  9:18             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-08-20 23:07         ` Paul Mackerras
2007-08-21  2:18         ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-21  7:09           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21 10:07             ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-21 10:20               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21 11:15                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-21 11:20                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21  8:17     ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-21  8:42       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21  9:11         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-08-21  9:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21  9:48             ` Paul Mackerras
2007-08-21 10:38             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-08-21 11:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21 11:58                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-08-21 10:39             ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-21 10:43             ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-21 11:15               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21 11:24                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-21 11:30                   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21 11:58                     ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-21 12:21                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-21 12:57                         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-08-21 11:25       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-22  7:50         ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-22  7:59           ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found] ` <200708141032.47235.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
     [not found]   ` <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708140835240.30176@woody.linux-foundation.org>
2007-08-14 18:19     ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200708161017.56971.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®