From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
To: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@insightbb.com>,
linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: sysfs change of input/event devices in 2.6.23rc breaks udev
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 22:29:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070908182928.5AEAA402B15@smtp03.mtu.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E2D712.1010402@gmail.com>
Anssi Hannula wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There seem to be changes in sysfs input structure between 2.6.22 and
> 2.6.23-rc5 which cause some breakage.
>
I'm running 2.6.23-rc5 in up-to-date cooker.
> With 2.6.22:
>
>> # LC_ALL=C ls -l /sys/class/input/input4
>> total 0
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 12:51 capabilities/
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:48 device ->
>> ../../../devices/platform/pcspkr/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 12:51 event4/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 12:51 id/
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:48 modalias
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:48 name
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:48 phys
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:48 subsystem ->
>> ../../../class/input/
>> --w------- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:48 uevent
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:48 uniq
>
>> # ls -l /sys/class/input/event4
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:48 /sys/class/input/event4 ->
>> ../../class/input/input4/event4/
>> # ls -l /sys/class/input/event4/
>> total 0
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:58 dev
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:58 device ->
>> ../../../../devices/platform/pcspkr/
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:58 subsystem ->
>> ../../../../class/input/
>> --w------- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:58 uevent
>
> With 2.6.23-rc5:
>
>> # ls -l /sys/class/input/input5
>> total 0
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 19:47 capabilities/
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:03 device ->
>> ../../../devices/platform/pcspkr/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 19:47 id/
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:47 input:event5 ->
>> ../../../class/input/event5/
I do not have this
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:03 modalias
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:03 name
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:47 phys
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 19:47 power/
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:03 subsystem ->
>> ../../../class/input/
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:03 uevent
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:47 uniq
>
>> # ls -l /sys/class/input/event5
>> total 0
>> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:03 dev
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:03 device ->
>> ../../../class/input/input5/
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 19:48 power/
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 19:03 subsystem ->
>> ../../../class/input/
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 19:03 uevent
>
> There are a few changes.
>
> There is no longer:
> /sys/class/input/eventX => /sys/class/input/inputX/eventX
> instead there is:
> /sys/class/inputX/input:eventX => /sys/class/input/eventX
> Notice the added "input:". I don't know if any software depends on this,
> though.
>
> However, the change that broke id_path of udev is that
> /sys/class/input/event5/device is now a symlink to the inputX directory
> instead of being the same as the device symlink in inputX directory,
> i.e. to ../../../devices/platform/pcspkr in this case.
>
> Udev id_path uses that directory to construct the ID_PATH variable.
> Should the sysfs structure be reverted or should udev be adapted to
> handle traversing /device symlink twice? I think the former, as there
> should be considerably more time to adapt udev for coming changes in
> sysfs.
>
I am using 2.6.23-rc5 in current cooker and I did not notice any breakage;
could you please show example of wrong path? E.g. I have
{pts/0}% LC_ALL=C ll /dev/input/by-path
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Sep 2 15:00
platform-i8042-serio-0-event-kbd -> ../event0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Sep 2 15:00
platform-i8042-serio-1-event-mouse -> ../event1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Sep 2 15:00
platform-i8042-serio-1-mouse -> ../mouse0
and it looks pretty sane for me.
Oh, and I do not have CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED which probably explains why it
works for me :)
{pts/0}% LC_ALL=C ll /sys/class/input/input2/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 22:25 capabilities/
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Sep 8 22:22 event2/
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 22:25 id/
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 22:25 modalias
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 22:25 name
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 22:25 phys
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 8 22:25 power/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Sep 8 22:25
subsystem -> ../../../../class/input/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 22:25 uevent
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Sep 8 22:25 uniq
this implies that SYSFS_DEPRECATED may be broken w.r.t. udev; OTOH it *is*
deprecated, is not it?
-andrey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-08 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-08 17:08 Anssi Hannula
2007-09-08 18:29 ` Andrey Borzenkov [this message]
2007-09-08 19:38 ` Anssi Hannula
2007-09-08 19:46 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-09-09 23:03 ` Kay Sievers
2007-09-10 2:40 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2007-09-10 5:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-10 5:44 ` Greg KH
2007-09-10 13:24 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-15 8:05 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-15 14:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-15 15:46 ` Anssi Hannula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070908182928.5AEAA402B15@smtp03.mtu.ru \
--to=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=anssi.hannula@gmail.com \
--cc=dtor@insightbb.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®