From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] lockdep: validate rcu_dereference() vs rcu_read_lock()
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:41:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070919105054.332308000@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070919104125.286538000@chello.nl>
[-- Attachment #1: rcu-lockdep-validate.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4293 bytes --]
Warn when rcu_dereference() is not used in combination with rcu_read_lock()
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 4 +++
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 3 ++
kernel/lockdep.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/lockdep.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ extern void lockdep_free_key_range(void
extern void lockdep_off(void);
extern void lockdep_on(void);
+extern int lockdep_enabled(void);
/*
* These methods are used by specific locking variants (spinlocks,
@@ -303,6 +304,8 @@ extern void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_
extern void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested,
unsigned long ip);
+extern int lock_is_held(struct lockdep_map *lock);
+
# define INIT_LOCKDEP .lockdep_recursion = 0,
#define lockdep_depth(tsk) (debug_locks ? (tsk)->lockdep_depth : 0)
@@ -319,6 +322,7 @@ static inline void lockdep_on(void)
# define lock_acquire(l, s, t, r, c, i) do { } while (0)
# define lock_release(l, n, i) do { } while (0)
+# define lock_is_held(l) (0)
# define lockdep_init() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_info() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_init_map(lock, name, key, sub) do { (void)(key); } while (0)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/rcupdate.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -138,9 +138,11 @@ extern int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu);
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
# define rcu_read_acquire() lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map, 0, 0, 2, 1, _THIS_IP_)
# define rcu_read_release() lock_release(&rcu_lock_map, 1, _THIS_IP_)
+# define rcu_read_held() WARN_ON_ONCE(lockdep_enabled() && !lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map))
#else
# define rcu_read_acquire() do { } while (0)
# define rcu_read_release() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_read_held() do { } while (0)
#endif
/**
@@ -256,6 +258,7 @@ extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
#define rcu_dereference(p) ({ \
typeof(p) _________p1 = ACCESS_ONCE(p); \
smp_read_barrier_depends(); \
+ rcu_read_held(); \
(_________p1); \
})
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -284,6 +284,13 @@ void lockdep_on(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_on);
+int lockdep_enabled(void)
+{
+ return debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(lockdep_enabled);
+
/*
* Debugging switches:
*/
@@ -2624,6 +2631,36 @@ static int lock_release_nested(struct ta
return 1;
}
+static int __lock_is_held(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+{
+ struct task_struct *curr = current;
+ struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock;
+ unsigned int depth;
+ int i;
+
+ /*
+ * Check whether the lock exists in the current stack
+ * of held locks:
+ */
+ depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
+ if (!depth)
+ return 0;
+
+ prev_hlock = NULL;
+ for (i = depth-1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
+ /*
+ * We must not cross into another context:
+ */
+ if (prev_hlock && prev_hlock->irq_context != hlock->irq_context)
+ break;
+ if (hlock->instance == lock)
+ return 1;
+ prev_hlock = hlock;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Remove the lock to the list of currently held locks - this gets
* called on mutex_unlock()/spin_unlock*() (or on a failed
@@ -2727,6 +2764,29 @@ void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lo
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_release);
+int lock_is_held(struct lockdep_map *lock)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (unlikely(!lock_stat && !prove_locking))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+ check_flags(flags);
+ current->lockdep_recursion = 1;
+ ret = __lock_is_held(lock);
+ current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
+ raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_is_held);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
static int
print_lock_contention_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-19 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-19 10:41 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] using lockdep to validate rcu usage Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] lockdep: annotate rcu_read_{,un}lock{,_bh} Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 23:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2007-09-19 14:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] lockdep: validate rcu_dereference() vs rcu_read_lock() Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 15:16 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 15:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 15:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 16:59 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 17:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 17:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 18:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 19:49 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 20:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 21:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 21:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-19 21:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-20 17:31 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-21 0:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-21 14:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-09-21 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] lockdep: rcu_dereference() vs preempt_disable() Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] implicit vs explicit preempt_disable() Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] fixup funny preemption tricks in irq_exit Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 10:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] fixup early boot Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-19 13:38 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/6] using lockdep to validate rcu usage Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070919105054.332308000@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome