From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: npiggin@suse.de
Cc: duaneg@dghda.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23 regression: accessing invalid mmap'ed memory from gdb causes unkillable spinning
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:56:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071030.235600.254712083.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071031064221.GC12189@wotan.suse.de>
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:42:21 +0100
> Sysrq+T fails to show the stack trace of a running task. Presumably this
> is to avoid a garbled stack, however it can often be useful, and besides
> there is no guarantee that the task won't start running in the middle of
> show_stack(). If there are any correctness issues, then the archietcture
> would have to take further steps to ensure the task is not running.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
This is useful.
Even more useful would be a show_regs() on the cpu where running tasks
are running. If not a full show_regs() at least a program counter.
That's usually what you're trying to debug and we provide nearly no
way to handle: some task is stuck in a loop in kernel mode and you
need to know exactly where that is.
This is pretty easy to do on sparc64. In fact I can capture remote
cpu registers even when that CPU's interrupts are disabled. I suppose
other arches could do a NMI'ish register capture like this as well.
I have a few bug reports that I can't make more progress on because I
currently can't ask users to do something to fetch the registers on
the seemingly hung processor. This is why I'm harping on this so
much :-)
Anyways, my core suggestion is to add a hook here so platforms can
do the remote register fetch if they want.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-31 0:45 Duane Griffin
2007-10-31 4:19 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 10:27 ` Duane Griffin
2007-10-31 15:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-31 15:19 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-31 17:19 ` Duane Griffin
2007-10-31 22:55 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 23:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01 2:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 15:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01 15:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 16:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01 23:56 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 1:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-02 6:30 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 6:56 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-10-31 7:41 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 7:44 ` David Miller
2007-11-02 5:02 ` David Miller
2007-11-02 10:45 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 15:36 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071030.235600.254712083.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duaneg@dghda.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®