mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: npiggin@suse.de
Cc: duaneg@dghda.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23 regression: accessing invalid mmap'ed memory from gdb causes unkillable spinning
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:56:00 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071030.235600.254712083.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071031064221.GC12189@wotan.suse.de>

From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:42:21 +0100

> Sysrq+T fails to show the stack trace of a running task. Presumably this
> is to avoid a garbled stack, however it can often be useful, and besides
> there is no guarantee that the task won't start running in the middle of
> show_stack(). If there are any correctness issues, then the archietcture
> would have to take further steps to ensure the task is not running.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>

This is useful.

Even more useful would be a show_regs() on the cpu where running tasks
are running.  If not a full show_regs() at least a program counter.

That's usually what you're trying to debug and we provide nearly no
way to handle: some task is stuck in a loop in kernel mode and you
need to know exactly where that is.

This is pretty easy to do on sparc64.  In fact I can capture remote
cpu registers even when that CPU's interrupts are disabled.  I suppose
other arches could do a NMI'ish register capture like this as well.

I have a few bug reports that I can't make more progress on because I
currently can't ask users to do something to fetch the registers on
the seemingly hung processor.  This is why I'm harping on this so
much :-)

Anyways, my core suggestion is to add a hook here so platforms can
do the remote register fetch if they want.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-31  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-31  0:45 Duane Griffin
2007-10-31  4:19 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 10:27   ` Duane Griffin
2007-10-31 15:11   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-31 15:19     ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 15:59       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-10-31 17:19         ` Duane Griffin
2007-10-31 22:55         ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31 23:08           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01  2:37             ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 15:14               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01 15:47                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-01 16:08                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-01 23:56                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02  1:17                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-02  6:30                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31  6:42 ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31  6:56   ` David Miller [this message]
2007-10-31  7:41     ` Nick Piggin
2007-10-31  7:44       ` David Miller
2007-11-02  5:02         ` David Miller
2007-11-02 10:45           ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-02 15:36             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071030.235600.254712083.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=duaneg@dghda.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®