From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] Suspend: Testing facility
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 19:54:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711031954.01644.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071103182319.GC13202@elf.ucw.cz>
Hi,
On Saturday, 3 November 2007 19:23, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Introduce /sys/power/pm_test_level attribute allowing one to test the suspend
> > core code. Namely, writing a number (1-5) to this file causes the suspend code
> > to work in one of the test modes defined as follows:
> >
> > 5 - test the freezing of processes
> > 4 - test the freezing of processes and suspending of devices
> > 3 - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices and platform global
> > control methods
> > 2 - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices, platform global
> > control methods and the disabling of nonboot CPUs
> > 1 - test the freezing of processes, suspending of devices, platform global
> > control methods, the disabling of nonboot CPUs and suspending of
> > platform/system devices
> >
> > Then, if a suspend is started by normal means, the suspend core will perform
> > its normal operations up to the point indicated by the test level. Next, it
> > will wait for 5 seconds and carry out the resume operations needed to transition
> > the system back to the fully functional state.
> >
> > Writing 0 to /sys/power/pm_test_level turns the testing off. The current test
> > level may be read from /sys/power/pm_test_level .
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>
> ACK on whole series, but... should we also remove the old debugging
> infrastructure? (Or did I just miss it?)
Well, I don't want to remove it just yet, but it's going to be deprecated.
Also, after Johannes' remark I thought it wouldn't be a good idea to export the
bare test levels to the user. For this reason I reworked the patches to use
strings instead of numbers for the test setting (the attribute is now called
"pm_test" and is used in a similar way to "disk").
I'll post the reworked series as soon as I update the changelogs and docs.
Greetings,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-03 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-01 22:57 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Suspend and hibernation test facility Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-01 22:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] Suspend: Testing facility Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-02 10:33 ` [linux-pm] " Johannes Berg
2007-11-02 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-03 18:23 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-03 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2007-11-01 22:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] Hibernation: New testing facility Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-01 23:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] PM: Suspend/hibernation debug documentation update Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711031954.01644.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®