mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
	gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [2.6 patch] usb/serial/oti6858.c: cleanups
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:14:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711121414.37322.oliver@neukum.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071112103720.GG9771@stusta.de>

Am Montag 12 November 2007 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:40:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Montag 05 November 2007 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > > This patch containsthe following cleanups:
> > > - make the needlessly global send_data() static
> > > - an author without anemail address is OK, not a FIXME
> > 
> > That should be up to the author. If he thinks it should be there it might
> > be worth a FIXME
> 
> I would be very surprised if the reason for these FIXMEs was different 
> from the driver submitter not knowing a current address of the author...

Is there any evidence the author didn't submit it?

> > > - directly put the IDs into the id_table
> > 
> > Why?
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion on this one, but my impression was that 
> there's generally a move away from using once-used #define's for such 
> stuff.

Well, vendor IDs should be centralised.

> > > - remove the now-empty oti6858.h
> > > - kill the pointless driver version number
> > 
> > Why? There might be a new version in the future. If the author put
> > it there he might have had his reasons.
> 
> A version number makes sense when there's a maintainer who is 
> maintaining and using it to identify different versions of a driver.
> 
> But some ancient version number that contains less information than
> "the version of this driver shipped with kernel 2.6.xy" doesn't have any 
> value.

Very well.

	Regards
		Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-12 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-05 17:07 Adrian Bunk
2007-11-05 20:40 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-11-12 10:37   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-12 13:14     ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2007-11-12 13:31       ` [linux-usb-devel] " Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711121414.37322.oliver@neukum.org \
    --to=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®