* is it useful testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED in dev_close()?
@ 2007-11-20 10:26 wyb
2007-11-20 10:42 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: wyb @ 2007-11-20 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
cpu0 calling netif_rx_schedule_prep(), cpu1 calling dev_close():
cpu0: testing __LINK_STATE_START, already set
cpu1: clear__LINK_STATE_START
cpu1: testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, not set
cpu0: set __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED
cpu0: enter net poll, ...
when cpu1 return from dev_close(),__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED is still set.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: is it useful testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED in dev_close()?
2007-11-20 10:26 is it useful testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED in dev_close()? wyb
@ 2007-11-20 10:42 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2007-11-20 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wyb; +Cc: linux-kernel
From: <wyb@topsec.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:26:26 +0800
> cpu0 calling netif_rx_schedule_prep(), cpu1 calling dev_close():
>
> cpu0: testing __LINK_STATE_START, already set
> cpu1: clear__LINK_STATE_START
> cpu1: testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, not set
> cpu0: set __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED
> cpu0: enter net poll, ...
>
> when cpu1 return from dev_close(),__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED is still set.
You'll have better luck asking networking questions on
netdev@vger.kernel.org as that is the mailing list where
the kernel networking developers are subscribed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-20 10:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-20 10:26 is it useful testing __LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED in dev_close()? wyb
2007-11-20 10:42 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®