* [PATCH 3/4] UML - after_sleep_interval should return something
@ 2007-11-28 19:04 Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2007-11-28 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: LKML, uml-devel
[ This should be merged with uml-fix-no_hz-busy-loop.patch ]
I forgot to have an int-returning function actually return something.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/um/os-Linux/time.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c 2007-11-28 10:42:52.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c 2007-11-28 11:37:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ long long os_nsecs(void)
#ifdef UML_CONFIG_NO_HZ
static int after_sleep_interval(struct timespec *ts)
{
+ return 0;
}
#else
static inline long long timespec_to_us(const struct timespec *ts)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-11-28 19:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-28 19:04 [PATCH 3/4] UML - after_sleep_interval should return something Jeff Dike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome