why is kmap_prot not always a define?

mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* why is kmap_prot not always a define?
@ 2007-11-30 22:16 Kumar Gala
  2007-12-04 12:54 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2007-11-30 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mingo; +Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, linux-kernel

Is there some reason why kmap_prot isn't just a #define on all archs?

- k

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: why is kmap_prot not always a define?
  2007-11-30 22:16 why is kmap_prot not always a define? Kumar Gala
@ 2007-12-04 12:54 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2007-12-04 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: mingo, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, linux-kernel

* Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> Is there some reason why kmap_prot isn't just a #define on all archs?

none that i can remember - why do you ask? Do you have some cleanup 
idea?

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-04 12:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-30 22:16 why is kmap_prot not always a define? Kumar Gala
2007-12-04 12:54 ` Ingo Molnar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome