From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: andi@firstfloor.org
Cc: mtk.manpages@googlemail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
lkml@davidb.org, paulus@samba.org, drepper@redhat.com,
cfriesen@nortel.com, schwab@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: compat_sys_times() bogus until jiffies >= 0.
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:45:47 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071221.174547.136433173.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221.174124.208826257.davem@davemloft.net>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:41:24 -0800 (PST)
> I'm suggesting that you set the condition codes based upon whether
> there is an error or not. That is the critical thing x86 doesn't do
> that all the other platforms do.
And if you still don't get it, I'm saying that x86, in the syscall
trap return path, should set the conditon codes based upon whether the
system call is really signalling an error or not.
And to handle potentially ambiguous cases we, for a long time, have
the force_successful_syscall_return() arch hook. System call
implementations use this when the return values they give could be
mis-construed as error values.
And if you'll notice x86 makes no attempt to implement that hook,
because it currently can't. That's what needs to be fixed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-22 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-07 22:47 David Brown
2007-11-07 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 0:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 0:54 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-08 1:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 1:53 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-11-08 2:09 ` David Miller
2007-11-08 10:20 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-11-08 14:42 ` Chris Friesen
2007-11-09 18:20 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-12-20 11:36 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-12-20 11:51 ` David Miller
2007-12-22 0:42 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-22 1:41 ` David Miller
2007-12-22 1:45 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-12-22 1:53 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-22 4:36 ` David Miller
2007-12-22 12:47 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-22 1:49 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-08 19:25 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-11-08 3:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 3:13 ` David Miller
2007-11-08 5:15 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-11-08 6:24 ` David Miller
2007-11-08 4:59 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-11-08 5:20 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 5:36 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-11-08 6:12 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 6:25 ` David Miller
2007-11-08 7:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 7:14 ` David Miller
2007-11-08 8:53 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-11-08 6:22 ` David Miller
2007-11-08 19:27 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-11-08 0:50 ` David Miller
2007-11-08 1:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 6:00 ` David Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071221.174547.136433173.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@davidb.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®