mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>
Cc: Richard D <richard@embunus.com>,
	"'Matthew Bloch'" <matthew@bytemark.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing RAM from userspace / question about memmap= arguments
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:47:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071222184759.GB31809@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <476D35F6.90900@davidnewall.com>

On Sun 2007-12-23 02:36:14, David Newall wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Sat 2007-12-22 13:42:47, Richard D wrote:
>>   
>>> Cant you, modify bootmem allocator to test with memtest patterns and then
>>> use kexec (as Pavel suggested) to test the one where kernel was sitting
>>> earlier?
>>
>> I do not think you need to modify anything in kernel. Just use
>> /dev/mem to test areas that kernel doesn't see, then kexec into place
>> you already tested, and test the rest.
>
> That's still an insufficient test.  One failure mode is writes at one 
> location corrupting cells at another.
>
> The idea of wanting to do comprehensive and robust memory testing from 
> within the operating system seems dubious at best, to me.  If there is 
> something wrong with memtest86, doing the tests from within Linux is not 
> the answer.  The answer is to fix memtest86.  If the problem is that you 
> automation, e.g. switching a server from production to memory test mode at 
> midnight and back again at 6am, the answer is still to "fix" memtest86.  
> Writing something that grabs some physical RAM from Linux's control, tests 
> it, and then moves the kernel itself so that it can test the rest, is 
> adding a whole extra layer of complexity to an already challenging (I 
> assume, based on errors that dedicated software-based testers miss) 
> problem.

Well, we have kexec. We already have way for kernel to relocate itself.

> Give up on this misguided idea and build on the best tools that are already 
> available.

Yes, the idea is "interesting". I do not think it quite cuts
"misguided" part.

memtest has following problems:

	0) it is kind of hard to run memtest over ssh

	1) if linux fixes some problem with PCI quirk or microcode
	upload, memtest will not see the fix

	2) if memory only fails while something else happens (DMA to
	other piece of memory? Hard disk load glitching powre
	supply?), memtest will not see the problem.

(Of course, memtest-under-linux has some problems too. Like "if it
freezes, was it bad memory or kernel problem").
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-22 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-18 17:06 Matthew Bloch
2007-12-20 12:33 ` Jon Masters
2007-12-20 14:17   ` Matthew Bloch
2007-12-21 12:58 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22  8:12   ` Richard D
2007-12-22 13:46     ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 15:30       ` Richard D
2007-12-22 18:43         ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 16:06       ` David Newall
2007-12-22 18:47         ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-12-22 20:36           ` David Newall
2007-12-22 20:54             ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-23  7:35               ` David Newall
2007-12-23 11:17                 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 20:48         ` Matthew Bloch
2007-12-22 20:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-25 23:09   ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-26 10:17     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-26 20:37       ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-20 17:01 Siva Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071222184759.GB31809@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=david@davidnewall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@bytemark.co.uk \
    --cc=richard@embunus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®