From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>
Cc: Richard D <richard@embunus.com>,
"'Matthew Bloch'" <matthew@bytemark.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing RAM from userspace / question about memmap= arguments
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:17:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071223111752.GA2340@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <476E0FDF.9030407@davidnewall.com>
On Sun 2007-12-23 18:05:59, David Newall wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Sun 2007-12-23 07:06:58, David Newall wrote:
>>
>>> It's kind of hard to run anything over SSH if it has to be run before
>>> userspace is up. But the kernel can collect results from a modified
>>> memtest, after it chains back.
>>>
>>
>> memtest can be ran from userspace, that's the point.
>>
>
> I'm not sure I believe that. You need to tinker with hardware tables
> before you know what physical RAM is being used. Sequential virtual
No, I can just use /dev/mem. (After passing mem=XXX exactmap to kernel
so that I know what I may play with).
>> Yes, that's what CPU microcode update is for. And I want to test my
>> RAM with up-to-date microcode.
>>
>
> Don't microcode updates fix CPU bugs? That's not fixing faulty RAM.
L1/L2 cache is part of memory subsystem.
> I suppose a CPU retains microcode updates, once loaded, until power-down or
> some hard reboot that you surely can avoid. If it does happen that
> you
If CPU retains microcode after reset, then you are right. I'm not
sure.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-23 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-18 17:06 Matthew Bloch
2007-12-20 12:33 ` Jon Masters
2007-12-20 14:17 ` Matthew Bloch
2007-12-21 12:58 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 8:12 ` Richard D
2007-12-22 13:46 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 15:30 ` Richard D
2007-12-22 18:43 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 16:06 ` David Newall
2007-12-22 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 20:36 ` David Newall
2007-12-22 20:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-23 7:35 ` David Newall
2007-12-23 11:17 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-12-22 20:48 ` Matthew Bloch
2007-12-22 20:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-25 23:09 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-26 10:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-26 20:37 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-20 17:01 Siva Prasad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071223111752.GA2340@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=david@davidnewall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@bytemark.co.uk \
--cc=richard@embunus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome