mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>
Cc: Richard D <richard@embunus.com>,
	"'Matthew Bloch'" <matthew@bytemark.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing RAM from userspace / question about memmap= arguments
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:17:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071223111752.GA2340@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <476E0FDF.9030407@davidnewall.com>

On Sun 2007-12-23 18:05:59, David Newall wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Sun 2007-12-23 07:06:58, David Newall wrote:
>>   
>>> It's kind of hard to run anything over SSH if it has to be run before 
>>> userspace is up.  But the kernel can collect results from a modified 
>>> memtest, after it chains back.
>>>     
>>
>> memtest can be ran from userspace, that's the point.
>>   
>
> I'm not sure I believe that.  You need to tinker with hardware tables 
> before you know what physical RAM is being used.  Sequential virtual

No, I can just use /dev/mem. (After passing mem=XXX exactmap to kernel
so that I know what I may play with).

>> Yes, that's what CPU microcode update is for. And I want to test my
>> RAM with up-to-date microcode.
>>   
>
> Don't microcode updates fix CPU bugs?  That's not fixing faulty RAM.

L1/L2 cache is part of memory subsystem.

> I suppose a CPU retains microcode updates, once loaded, until power-down or 
> some hard reboot that you surely can avoid.  If it does happen that
> you

If CPU retains microcode after reset, then you are right. I'm not
sure.
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-23 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-18 17:06 Matthew Bloch
2007-12-20 12:33 ` Jon Masters
2007-12-20 14:17   ` Matthew Bloch
2007-12-21 12:58 ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22  8:12   ` Richard D
2007-12-22 13:46     ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 15:30       ` Richard D
2007-12-22 18:43         ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 16:06       ` David Newall
2007-12-22 18:47         ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-22 20:36           ` David Newall
2007-12-22 20:54             ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-23  7:35               ` David Newall
2007-12-23 11:17                 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-12-22 20:48         ` Matthew Bloch
2007-12-22 20:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-25 23:09   ` Pavel Machek
2007-12-26 10:17     ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-26 20:37       ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-20 17:01 Siva Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071223111752.GA2340@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=david@davidnewall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@bytemark.co.uk \
    --cc=richard@embunus.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome