Re: [patch 2/2] Add the end-of-trace marker and the module list to WARN_ON()

[Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>]

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 10:27:28PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> Another issue is that, unlike oopses, WARN_ON() doesn't currently printk
> the helpful "cut here" line, nor the "end of trace" marker.
> Now that WARN_ON() is out of line, the size increase due to this is
> minimal and it's worth adding.
>
> +static void print_oops_end_marker(void)
> +{
> +	init_oops_id();
> +	printk(KERN_WARNING "---[ end trace %016llx ]---\n",
> +		(unsigned long long)oops_id);
> +}

There is also lib/bug.c which prints the "cut here" line but not the
"end of trace" line. Also it prints whatever it prints with a different
printk level.
Quite a few architectures use lib/bug.c also for WARN_ONs.
Maybe all the code should be in one place so it doesn't diverge all the
time?