From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Cc: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org,
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] 2.6.25 regression: VIDEO_DEV=y/m, I2C=n compile error
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:12:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080128121245.GG1001@does.not.exist> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080128094912.1848eacd@gaivota>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:49:12AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Maybe the kernel headers should provide a couple macros for testing
> > configs, since people get it wrong over and over again?
> >
> > #define CONFIG_ON(x) (defined(CONFIG_##x) || defined(CONFIG_##x##_MODULE))
> > #define CONFIG_AVAIABLE(x) (defined(CONFIG_##x) || (defined(MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_##x##_MODULE)))
>
> Seems a good idea to me.
> >
> > Not sure what to do about VIDEO_DEV=y, I2C=m. It should be possible except
> > for this function.
>
> I don't see much sense on allowing v4l2-common being in-kernel, while having
> I2C as module. Also, creating a separate module for just a single function
> seems to be overkill.
>
> IMO, in this specific case, v4l2-common should also be a module. Not sure,
> however,the better syntax on Kconfig. Once, someone suggested a very weird
> syntax, like:
>
> depends on I2C if I2C
Why does anyone want to introduce such a weird syntax for something
that already works with the simple
depends on I2C || I2C=n
?
> Cheers,
> Mauro
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-27 18:52 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-28 0:33 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-28 8:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-28 9:05 ` [v4l-dvb-maintainer] " Trent Piepho
2008-01-28 11:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-28 12:12 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-01-28 12:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-28 12:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-29 16:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-28 12:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-28 12:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-01 19:24 ` Trent Piepho
2008-01-29 18:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080128121245.GG1001@does.not.exist \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org \
--cc=xyzzy@speakeasy.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome