mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trent Piepho <xyzzy@speakeasy.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org,
	Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] 2.6.25 regression: VIDEO_DEV=y/m, I2C=n compile error
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:24:09 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0802011117120.5488@shell2.speakeasy.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801281314450.1185@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 28 2008 01:05, Trent Piepho wrote:
>
> >Maybe the kernel headers should provide a couple macros for testing
> >configs, since people get it wrong over and over again?
> >
> >#define CONFIG_ON(x) (defined(CONFIG_##x) || defined(CONFIG_##x##_MODULE))
> >#define CONFIG_AVAIABLE(x) (defined(CONFIG_##x) || (defined(MODULE) && defined(CONFIG_##x##_MODULE)))
>                ^AVAILABLE(x)
>
> What's the difference between these two?
>
> CONFIG_x_MODULE will never be defined if MODULE is not, so defined(MODULE)
> seems redundant.

You're probably thinking of CONFIG_MODULES, which indicates the kernel
supports module loading.  MODULE indicates the current code is being
compiled as a module.  The idea is that code compiled in the kernel can't
call modules.  Generally what you would see is:

#if CONFIG_ON(x)
code that will be _used by_ x
probably want x to depend on us in Kconfig
#endif
#if CONFIG_AVAILABLE(x)
code that wants _to use_ x
#endif

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-01 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-27 18:52 Adrian Bunk
2008-01-28  0:33 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-28  8:40   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-28  9:05     ` [v4l-dvb-maintainer] " Trent Piepho
2008-01-28 11:49       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-28 12:12         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-01-28 12:22           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-28 12:25             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-29 16:38           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-01-28 12:17       ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-01-28 12:25         ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-01 19:24         ` Trent Piepho [this message]
2008-01-29 18:42       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0802011117120.5488@shell2.speakeasy.net \
    --to=xyzzy@speakeasy.org \
    --cc=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome