mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>
To: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, nai.xia@gmail.com, rdreier@cisco.com,
	bzolnier@gmail.com, flo@rfc822.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at ide-cd.c:1726 in 2.6.24-03863-g0ba6c33 && -g8561b089
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:29:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080201182909.GA7837@gollum.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080201.123927.71085228.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>

On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:39:27PM -0500, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:

<snip>

> > > end_that_request_last() is not called when __blk_end_reuqest()
> > > returns 1.  Then, the issuer isn't waken up.
> > > So I think the BUG() or error messages should be there.
> > 
> > you mean, end_that_request_last() isn't called when __end_that_request_first()
> > returns an error and this is the case only for fs and pc requests.
> > Otherwise it _is_ called, thus simulating somewhat the previous behavior.
> > However, we never BUG()'ged on residual byte counts before and
> > this driver has been in the kernel tree for ages, so what puzzles
> > me now is how is BUG()'ing here better than before and shouldn't we
> > simply issue a warning instead of killing the interrupt handler...
> 
> The Jens' patch passes the residual byte counts to __blk_end_request(),
> so __end_that_reqeust_first() should never return 1 and we should never
> BUG() on the residual byte counts, unless inconsistency happens such as
> the size of remaining bios is bigger than the residual byte counts.

yep.

> So if __blk_end_request() returns 1 even with the Jens' patch,
> it means that the block layer or the driver really have a bug.
> And then, the request and the bios could leak or the issuer
> would wait forever because end_that_request_last() isn't called.
> 
> The previous behavior might ignore such inconsistency and leak only
> the bios because it was calling end_that_request_last() anyway.
> I would like to BUG() in such cases personally, but I don't object
> strongly if you prefer not to BUG().

BUG() is definitely what we should do here to catch this case of sizeof(bios) >
rq->data_len. Putting a brown paper bag over the issue will never get it fixed
if it really leaks bios. Thanks for clarifying that.

By the way, shouldn't we be doing a little branch prediction here:

diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c b/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
index 74c6087..bee05a3 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-cd.c
@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ static ide_startstop_t cdrom_newpc_intr(ide_drive_t *drive)
         */
        if ((stat & DRQ_STAT) == 0) {
                spin_lock_irqsave(&ide_lock, flags);
-               if (__blk_end_request(rq, 0, 0))
+               if (unlikely(__blk_end_request(rq, 0, rq->data_len)))
                        BUG();
                HWGROUP(drive)->rq = NULL;
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);


-- 
Regards/Gruß,
    Boris.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-01 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-29 14:01 Nai Xia
2008-01-29 15:33 ` Florian Lohoff
2008-01-29 20:13 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-01-29 22:22   ` Roland Dreier
2008-01-29 23:23     ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-01-29 23:58       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-01-30  5:03         ` Borislav Petkov
2008-01-30  5:16           ` Borislav Petkov
2008-01-31  1:26       ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-01-31  2:34         ` Roland Dreier
2008-01-31  7:49           ` Nai Xia
2008-01-31 13:05             ` Jens Axboe
2008-01-31 14:53               ` Florian Lohoff
2008-01-31 15:04                 ` Jens Axboe
2008-02-01 21:59                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-01-31 17:04               ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-01-31 18:16                 ` Jens Axboe
2008-01-31 20:35                   ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-01-31 21:37               ` Borislav Petkov
2008-01-31 22:35                 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-02-01  7:51                   ` Borislav Petkov
2008-02-01 17:39                     ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2008-02-01 18:29                       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2008-02-01 19:37                         ` Kiyoshi Ueda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080201182909.GA7837@gollum.tnic \
    --to=petkovbb@googlemail.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=flo@rfc822.org \
    --cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nai.xia@gmail.com \
    --cc=petkovbb@gmail.com \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®