From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com
Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node.
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:37:08 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080202180536.F494.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080202090914.GA27723@one.firstfloor.org>
Hi Andi,
> > 3. 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 set_mempolicy(2) behavior
> > 3.1 check nodesubset(nodemask argument, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY])
> > in mpol_check_policy()
> >
> > -> check failed when memmoryless node exist.
> > (i.e. node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] of my machine is 0xc)
> >
> > 4. RHEL5.1 set_mempolicy(2) behavior
> > 4.1 check nodesubset(nodemask argument, node_online_map)
> > in mpol_check_policy().
> >
> > -> check success.
> >
> > I don't know wrong either kernel or libnuma.
>
> When the kernel behaviour changes and breaks user space then the kernel
> is usually wrong. Cc'ed Lee S. who maintains the kernel code now.
may be yes, may be no.
I have 1 simple question.
Why do libnuma generate bitpattern of all bit on instead
check /sys/devices/system/node/has_high_memory nor
check /sys/devices/system/node/online?
Do you know it?
and I made simple patch that has_high_memory exposed however CONFIG_HIGHMEM disabled.
if CONFIG_HIGHMEM disabled, the has_high_memory file show
the same as the has_normal_memory.
may be, userland process should check has_high_memory file.
but, I am not confident.
Thanks.
- kosaki
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
drivers/base/node.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/base/node.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/base/node.c 2008-02-02 17:52:32.000000000 +0900
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c 2008-02-02 18:32:38.000000000 +0900
@@ -276,7 +276,6 @@ static SYSDEV_CLASS_ATTR(has_normal_memo
NULL);
static SYSDEV_CLASS_ATTR(has_cpu, 0444, print_nodes_has_cpu, NULL);
-#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
static ssize_t print_nodes_has_high_memory(struct sysdev_class *class,
char *buf)
{
@@ -285,15 +284,11 @@ static ssize_t print_nodes_has_high_memo
static SYSDEV_CLASS_ATTR(has_high_memory, 0444, print_nodes_has_high_memory,
NULL);
-#endif
-
struct sysdev_class_attribute *node_state_attr[] = {
&attr_possible,
&attr_online,
&attr_has_normal_memory,
-#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
&attr_has_high_memory,
-#endif
&attr_has_cpu,
};
@@ -302,7 +297,7 @@ static int node_states_init(void)
int i;
int err = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < NR_NODE_STATES; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(node_state_attr); i++) {
int ret;
ret = sysdev_class_create_file(&node_class, node_state_attr[i]);
if (!err)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-02 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-02 8:12 KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 9:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02 9:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-02-02 11:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-04 19:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-04 18:20 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 9:26 ` [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 21:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-06 16:00 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-06 2:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-06 16:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-06 6:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-06 17:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-07 8:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-08 19:45 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-09 18:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10 5:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10 5:49 ` Greg KH
2008-02-10 7:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10 10:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-11 16:47 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12 4:30 ` [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 5:06 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 5:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 13:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 10:17 ` [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 11:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 19:56 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 20:51 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 21:33 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 22:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:44 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 22:50 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 14:31 ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-05 15:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 18:27 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 19:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 20:06 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080202180536.F494.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®