From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node.
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:31:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080207172045.4AED.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202319495.5453.64.camel@localhost>
Hi Lee-san
Unfortunately, 2.6.24-mm1 can't boot on fujitsu machine.
(hmm, origin.patch cause regression to pci initialization ;-)
instead, I tested 2.6.24 + your patch.
it seem work good :)
Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
and, I have a bit comment.
> /* Do sanity checking on a policy */
> -static int mpol_check_policy(int mode, nodemask_t *nodes)
> +static int mpol_check_policy(int mode, nodemask_t *nodes, int was_empty)
was_empty argument is a bit ugly.
Could we unify mpol_check_policy and contextualize_policy?
mpol_check_policy only called from contextualize_policy.
> - return nodes_subset(*nodes, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> + return 0;
Could we N_POSSIBLE check?
I attached the patch for my idea explain.
on my test environment, your patch and mine works good both.
- kosaki
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Index: b/mm/mempolicy.c
===================================================================
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c 2008-02-07 17:19:09.000000000 +0900
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c 2008-02-07 17:24:28.000000000 +0900
@@ -114,9 +114,25 @@ static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct me
const nodemask_t *newmask);
/* Do sanity checking on a policy */
-static int mpol_check_policy(int mode, nodemask_t *nodes, int was_empty)
+static int mpol_check_policy(int mode, nodemask_t *nodes)
{
- int is_empty = nodes_empty(*nodes);
+ int was_empty;
+ int is_empty;
+
+ if (!nodes)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Remember whether in coming nodemask was empty, If not,
+ * restrict the nodes to the allowed nodes in the cpuset.
+ * This is guaranteed to be a subset of nodes with memory.
+ */
+ cpuset_update_task_memory_state();
+ was_empty = nodes_empty(*nodes);
+ if (!was_empty)
+ nodes_and(*nodes, *nodes, cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
+
+ is_empty = nodes_empty(*nodes);
switch (mode) {
case MPOL_DEFAULT:
@@ -144,7 +160,7 @@ static int mpol_check_policy(int mode, n
return -EINVAL;
break;
}
- return 0;
+ return nodes_subset(*nodes, node_states[N_POSSIBLE]) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
}
/* Generate a custom zonelist for the BIND policy. */
@@ -432,27 +448,6 @@ static int mbind_range(struct vm_area_st
return err;
}
-static int contextualize_policy(int mode, nodemask_t *nodes)
-{
- int was_empty;
-
- if (!nodes)
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * Remember whether in coming nodemask was empty, If not,
- * restrict the nodes to the allowed nodes in the cpuset.
- * This is guaranteed to be a subset of nodes with memory.
- */
- cpuset_update_task_memory_state();
- was_empty = nodes_empty(*nodes);
- if (!was_empty)
- nodes_and(*nodes, *nodes, cpuset_current_mems_allowed);
-
- return mpol_check_policy(mode, nodes, was_empty);
-}
-
-
/*
* Update task->flags PF_MEMPOLICY bit: set iff non-default
* mempolicy. Allows more rapid checking of this (combined perhaps
@@ -488,7 +483,7 @@ static long do_set_mempolicy(int mode, n
{
struct mempolicy *new;
- if (contextualize_policy(mode, nodes))
+ if (mpol_check_policy(mode, nodes))
return -EINVAL;
new = mpol_new(mode, nodes);
if (IS_ERR(new))
@@ -817,7 +812,7 @@ static long do_mbind(unsigned long start
if (end == start)
return 0;
- if (contextualize_policy(mode, nmask))
+ if (mpol_check_policy(mode, nmask))
return -EINVAL;
new = mpol_new(mode, nmask);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-07 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-02 8:12 [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 9:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-02 9:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-02 11:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-04 19:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-04 18:20 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 9:26 ` [2.6.24 regression][BUGFIX] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 21:57 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-06 16:00 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-06 2:17 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-06 16:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-06 6:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-06 17:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-07 8:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2008-02-08 19:45 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3 Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-09 18:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10 5:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-10 5:49 ` Greg KH
2008-02-10 7:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-10 10:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-11 16:47 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-12 4:30 ` [PATCH for 2.6.24][regression fix] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-12 5:06 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-12 5:07 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-12 13:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 10:17 ` [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 11:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-05 19:56 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 20:51 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 21:33 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 22:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 22:44 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-05 22:50 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 14:31 ` Mel Gorman
2008-02-05 15:23 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 18:27 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2008-02-05 19:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-05 19:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-05 20:06 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080207172045.4AED.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®