mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* sched-devel latencies
@ 2008-02-18 10:49 Dhaval Giani
  2008-02-18 11:01 ` Dhaval Giani
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dhaval Giani @ 2008-02-18 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Aneesh Kumar KV, efault
  Cc: lkml

Hi Ingo,

I am running the sched-devel tree (at HEAD
44e770a8750abc7e876076cda718b413bad9e654) and it is not looking good.

I am running two "make -j"s for the kernel in two different cgroups and
interactivity is going for a toss. I can see noticable lags in
keypresses.

Will get down to debugging it further a bit later on.

-- 
regards,
Dhaval

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: sched-devel latencies
  2008-02-18 10:49 sched-devel latencies Dhaval Giani
@ 2008-02-18 11:01 ` Dhaval Giani
  2008-02-18 11:05   ` Balbir Singh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dhaval Giani @ 2008-02-18 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Aneesh Kumar KV, efault
  Cc: lkml

On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:19:33PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> I am running the sched-devel tree (at HEAD
> 44e770a8750abc7e876076cda718b413bad9e654) and it is not looking good.
> 
> I am running two "make -j"s for the kernel in two different cgroups and
> interactivity is going for a toss. I can see noticable lags in
> keypresses.
> 
> Will get down to debugging it further a bit later on.
> 

Some more numbers, with exact scenario

1. Mount the cgroup
2. Make 3 groups
3. Start kernbench in each group
4. Start chew.

This is the chew output from the root cgroup 

[root@llm11 dhaval]# ./chew2 
pid 29345 preempted 544115 us after 1560 us
pid 29345 preempted 588109 us after 3935 us
pid 29345 preempted 632122 us after 3941 us
pid 29345 preempted 794259 us after 3954 us
pid 29345 preempted 972163 us after 3963 us
pid 29345 preempted 1024219 us after 3942 us

>From within one of the groups
[root@llm11 dhaval]# ./chew2 
pid 27961 preempted 4028 us after 1708 us
pid 27961 preempted 28090 us after 5466 us
pid 27961 preempted 52021 us after 6505 us
pid 27961 preempted 56100 us after 7183 us
pid 27961 preempted 61850 us after 7505 us
pid 27961 preempted 131892 us after 59 us
pid 27961 preempted 332112 us after 7607 us

-- 
regards,
Dhaval

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: sched-devel latencies
  2008-02-18 11:01 ` Dhaval Giani
@ 2008-02-18 11:05   ` Balbir Singh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Balbir Singh @ 2008-02-18 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dhaval Giani
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Srivatsa Vaddagiri, Aneesh Kumar KV,
	efault, lkml

On Feb 18, 2008 4:31 PM, Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:19:33PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > I am running the sched-devel tree (at HEAD
> > 44e770a8750abc7e876076cda718b413bad9e654) and it is not looking good.
> >
> > I am running two "make -j"s for the kernel in two different cgroups and
> > interactivity is going for a toss. I can see noticable lags in
> > keypresses.
> >
> > Will get down to debugging it further a bit later on.
> >
>
> Some more numbers, with exact scenario
>
> 1. Mount the cgroup
> 2. Make 3 groups
> 3. Start kernbench in each group
> 4. Start chew.
>
> This is the chew output from the root cgroup
>
> [root@llm11 dhaval]# ./chew2
> pid 29345 preempted 544115 us after 1560 us
> pid 29345 preempted 588109 us after 3935 us
> pid 29345 preempted 632122 us after 3941 us
> pid 29345 preempted 794259 us after 3954 us
> pid 29345 preempted 972163 us after 3963 us
> pid 29345 preempted 1024219 us after 3942 us
>
> From within one of the groups
> [root@llm11 dhaval]# ./chew2
> pid 27961 preempted 4028 us after 1708 us
> pid 27961 preempted 28090 us after 5466 us
> pid 27961 preempted 52021 us after 6505 us
> pid 27961 preempted 56100 us after 7183 us
> pid 27961 preempted 61850 us after 7505 us
> pid 27961 preempted 131892 us after 59 us
> pid 27961 preempted 332112 us after 7607 us
>

Is there anything to compare this data against? Was it better earlier,
if so which release?

Balbir

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-18 11:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-18 10:49 sched-devel latencies Dhaval Giani
2008-02-18 11:01 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-02-18 11:05   ` Balbir Singh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®