From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Glenn Streiff <gstreiff@NetEffect.com>,
Faisal Latif <flatif@NetEffect.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Merging of completely unreviewed drivers
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:01:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080221210124.GD28328@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adahcg2awag.fsf@cisco.com>
[ Linus Added to the To: since I want to hear his opinion on this issue. ]
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:28:55PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > This driver should really have gotten some review before being included
> > in the kernel.
>
> > Even a simple checkpatch run finds more than > 250 stylistic errors
> > (not code bugs but cases where the driver violates the standard code
> > formatting rules of kernel code).
>
> Linus has strongly stated that we should merge hardware drivers early,
> and I agree: although the nes driver clearly needs more work, there's
> no advantage to users with the hardware in forcing them to wait for
> 2.6.26 to merge the driver, since they'll just have to patch the
> grungy code in themselves anyway. And by merging the driver early, we
> get fixed up for any tree-wide changes and allow janitors to help with
> the cleanup.
Is it really intended to merge drivers without _any_ kind of review?
This driver even lacks a basic "please fix the > 250 checkpatch errors" [1]
and similar low hanging fruits that could easily be spotted and then
fixed by the submitter within a short amount of time.
I see the point that it might make sense to not prevent the merging of
drivers infinitely when they have some hard-to-fix issues, but was this
really meant as an excuse for maintainers to no longer any review of
what they merge at all?
> (By the way, the code is not that pretty but it a lot closer to
> upstream style than most driver submissions)
>...
There might be worse code being submitted, but when looking at what gets
merged into Linus' tree this driver beats all other drivers I remember
in both number of stylistic problems and bugs. [2]
> - R.
cu
Adrian
BTW: Greg, you are Cc'ed for your joke in [3]...
[1] not to mention the > 2000 checkpatch warnings
[2] as already said, that's not meant against the driver submitter
I'm complaining about the complete lack of review that would have
brought this driver into shape
[3] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/12/427
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 22:59 [2.6 patch] infiniband/hw/nes/nes_verbs.c: fix off-by-one Adrian Bunk
2008-02-20 4:23 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2008-02-20 5:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-20 23:21 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-20 23:27 ` Glenn Streiff
2008-02-21 12:39 ` Glenn Streiff
2008-02-21 15:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-21 20:28 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-21 21:01 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-02-21 21:09 ` Merging of completely unreviewed drivers Roland Dreier
2008-02-21 21:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-21 22:33 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-02-21 22:43 ` Greg KH
2008-02-21 22:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-21 22:58 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-02-21 23:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-21 23:38 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-21 23:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-22 0:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-21 23:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-22 0:05 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-22 0:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-22 2:02 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-22 10:04 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-22 18:45 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-22 22:44 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-23 9:43 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-23 12:38 ` David Newall
2008-02-23 15:25 ` Pavel Machek
2008-02-24 3:18 ` David Newall
2008-02-23 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-24 3:26 ` David Newall
2008-02-24 4:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-23 13:58 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-22 1:46 ` David Newall
2008-02-22 2:06 ` Al Viro
2008-02-22 2:23 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-22 3:13 ` Al Viro
2008-02-22 22:28 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-24 7:47 ` Jörn Engel
2008-02-24 14:47 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-22 3:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-22 6:29 ` [ofa-general] " Junio C Hamano
2008-02-22 9:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-22 6:37 ` Ray Lee
2008-02-23 15:31 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-02-24 3:22 ` David Newall
2008-02-22 22:37 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-22 12:29 ` [ofa-general] " Bart Van Assche
2008-02-22 14:25 ` David Newall
2008-02-22 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-22 16:48 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-22 22:59 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-02-22 23:14 ` Al Viro
2008-02-22 15:48 ` John W. Linville
2008-02-22 18:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-22 19:11 ` [ofa-general] " Bart Van Assche
2008-02-22 19:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-22 19:44 ` Greg KH
2008-02-21 21:30 ` Greg KH
2008-02-22 1:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-21 22:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-21 22:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-21 23:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-22 18:40 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080221210124.GD28328@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=flatif@NetEffect.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gstreiff@NetEffect.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®