From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: [2.6 patch] pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c: remove unneeded NULL check
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:58:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080222195847.GK1409@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080220160935.GA2658@kroah.com>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:09:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:56:28AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:47:58PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:29:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > The Coverity checker spotted the following inconsequent NULL checking
> > > > introduced by commit 3c75e23784e6ed5f4841de43d0750fd9b37bafcb:
> > > >
> > > > <-- snip -->
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > int aer_osc_setup(struct pcie_device *pciedev)
> > > > {
> > > > ... vvvvvvvvv
> > > > while (pdev->bus && pdev->bus->self)
> > > > pdev = pdev->bus->self;
> > >
> > > That could probably change to just pdev->bus->self, as a bus should
> > > always be there for a pdev, so I don't see this as a problem.
> >
> > I'm not claiming this specific case was a problem.
>
> Well, Coverity did :)
It only said it's once checked and once not.
> > When a NULL check is only performed in some cases that's sometimes a bug
> > that has to be fixed and in most cases a not required check that should
> > be removed at some point in time.
>
> I agree, patches are always welcome...
Patch below.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
There's no reason for checking pdev->bus for being NULL here (and we'd
anyway Oops 3 lines below if it was).
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
---
74832021c82be6e2ed6055f4f25dbf152df67cf5 diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c
index 8c199ae..1e2a858 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ int aer_osc_setup(struct pcie_device *pciedev)
acpi_handle handle = 0;
/* Find root host bridge */
- while (pdev->bus && pdev->bus->self)
+ while (pdev->bus->self)
pdev = pdev->bus->self;
handle = acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle(
pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), pdev->bus->number);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-22 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 19:29 pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c: inconsequent NULL checking Adrian Bunk
2008-02-20 5:47 ` Greg KH
2008-02-20 7:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-02-20 16:09 ` Greg KH
2008-02-22 19:58 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-03-30 22:41 [2.6 patch] pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_acpi.c: remove unneeded NULL check Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080222195847.GK1409@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.patterson@hp.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®