* [PATCH] firewire: unnecessary BM delay after generation rollover
@ 2008-03-24 19:56 Stefan Richter
2008-03-24 20:11 ` Jarod Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Richter @ 2008-03-24 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux1394-devel; +Cc: linux-kernel
Noticed by Jarod Wilson: The bus manager work was unnecessarily delayed
each time the bus generation counter rolled over.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
---
drivers/firewire/fw-card.c | 2 +-
drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c | 2 +-
drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.h | 9 +++++++++
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/firewire/fw-card.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/firewire/fw-card.c
+++ linux/drivers/firewire/fw-card.c
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ fw_card_bm_work(struct work_struct *work
root_id = root_node->node_id;
grace = time_after(jiffies, card->reset_jiffies + DIV_ROUND_UP(HZ, 10));
- if (card->bm_generation + 1 == generation ||
+ if (is_next_generation(generation, card->bm_generation) ||
(card->bm_generation != generation && grace)) {
/*
* This first step is to figure out who is IRM and
Index: linux/drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c
+++ linux/drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ fw_core_handle_bus_reset(struct fw_card
* previously processed one, we cannot reliably compare the
* old and new topologies.
*/
- if ((generation & 0xff) != ((card->generation + 1) & 0xff) &&
+ if (!is_next_generation(generation, card->generation) &&
card->local_node != NULL) {
fw_notify("skipped bus generations, destroying all nodes\n");
fw_destroy_nodes(card);
Index: linux/drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.h
+++ linux/drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.h
@@ -261,6 +261,15 @@ struct fw_card {
};
/*
+ * Check whether new_generation is the immediate successor of old_generation.
+ * Take counter roll-over at 255 (as per to OHCI) into account.
+ */
+static inline bool is_next_generation(int new_generation, int old_generation)
+{
+ return (new_generation & 0xff) == ((old_generation + 1) & 0xff);
+}
+
+/*
* The iso packet format allows for an immediate header/payload part
* stored in 'header' immediately after the packet info plus an
* indirect payload part that is pointer to by the 'payload' field.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --== ==---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] firewire: unnecessary BM delay after generation rollover
2008-03-24 19:56 [PATCH] firewire: unnecessary BM delay after generation rollover Stefan Richter
@ 2008-03-24 20:11 ` Jarod Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jarod Wilson @ 2008-03-24 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux1394-devel; +Cc: Stefan Richter, linux-kernel
On Monday 24 March 2008 03:56:40 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> Noticed by Jarod Wilson: The bus manager work was unnecessarily delayed
> each time the bus generation counter rolled over.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Much nicer than the crappy patch I had in mind (just adding another &&
0xff). :)
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@redhat.com>
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@redhat.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-24 20:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-24 19:56 [PATCH] firewire: unnecessary BM delay after generation rollover Stefan Richter
2008-03-24 20:11 ` Jarod Wilson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome