From: David Fries <david@fries.net>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 32/33 replaces 34/35] Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 update
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:15:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413231550.GG15213@spacedout.fries.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080413225632.GA14058@spacedout.fries.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4959 bytes --]
===================================================================
This is an update to the previous set of patches, don't merge them
yet. Some of the context was messed up and I don't expect patch to
apply the updates with the previous set cleanly. I'll resubmit the
entire set if these updates look good.
===================================================================
Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 1.1 through 1.4
Provide some additional details about the status of the driver.
Signed-off-by: David Fries <david@fries.net>
---
Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490 b/Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490
index 239f9ae..f8648d2 100644
--- a/Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490
+++ b/Documentation/w1/masters/ds2490
@@ -16,3 +16,65 @@ which allows to build USB <-> W1 bridges.
DS9490(R) is a USB <-> W1 bus master device
which has 0x81 family ID integrated chip and DS2490
low-level operational chip.
+
+Notes and limitations.
+- The weak pullup current is a minimum of 0.9mA and maximum of 6.0mA.
+- The 5V strong pullup is supported with a minimum of 5.9mA and a
+ maximum of 30.4 mA. (From DS2490.pdf)
+- While the ds2490 supports a hardware search the code doesn't take
+ advantage of it.
+- The hardware will detect when devices are attached to the bus on the
+ next bus (reset?) operation, however only a message is printed as
+ the core w1 code doesn't make use of the information. Connecting
+ one device tends to give multiple new device notifications.
+- The number of USB bus transactions could be reduced if w1_reset_send
+ was added to the API. The name is just a suggestion. It would take
+ a write buffer and a read buffer (along with sizes) as arguments.
+ It would add match rom and rom to the send buffer, reset the bus,
+ and read the result. The ds2490 block I/O command supports reset,
+ write, read, and strong pullup all in one command. That would
+ reduce the time and overhead for a set of commands.
+
+ The core w1 functions required to do a temperature conversion are,
+ w1_reset_select_slave, w1_next_pullup, and w1_write_8, which turn
+ around and execute the master functions, reset_bus, write_block,
+ set_pullup, write_byte, set_pullup. Each ds2490 function will have
+ multiple USB bus transactions, except set_pullup where it only
+ requires transactions if the if the time value is different. The
+ conversion could be reduced to w1_next_pullup, w1_reset_send which
+ would call set_pullup, reset_send. The reset_send would enable reset
+ and strong pullup (if enabled), write the data buffer, execute the
+ block I/O command, read status, and get data. Currently I count 11
+ transactions required, this would reduce it to 4.
+- The hardware supports normal, flexable, and overdrive bus
+ communication speeds, but only the normal is supported.
+- The registered w1_bus_master functions don't define error
+ conditions. If a bus search is in progress and the ds2490 is
+ removed it can produce a good amount of error output before the bus
+ search finishes.
+- The hardware supports detecting some error conditions, such as
+ short, alarming presence on reset, and no presence on reset, but the
+ driver doesn't query those values.
+- The ds2490 specification doesn't cover short bulk in reads in
+ detail, but my observation is if fewer bytes are requested than are
+ available, the bulk read will return an error and the hardware will
+ clear the entire bulk in buffer. It would be possible to read the
+ maximum buffer size to not run into this error condition, only extra
+ bytes in the buffer is a logic error in the driver. The code should
+ should match reads and writes as well as data sizes. Reads and
+ writes are serialized and the status verifies that the chip is idle
+ (and data is available) before the read is executed, so it should
+ not happen.
+- Running x86_64 2.6.24 UHCI under qemu 0.9.0 under x86_64 2.6.22-rc6
+ with a OHCI controller, ds2490 running in the guest would operate
+ normally the first time the module was loaded after qemu attached
+ the ds2490 hardware, but if the module was unloaded, then reloaded
+ most of the time one of the bulk out or in, and usually the bulk in
+ would fail. qemu sets a 50ms timeout and the bulk in would timeout
+ even when the status shows data available. A bulk out write would
+ show a successful completion, but the ds2490 status register would
+ show 0 bytes written. Detaching qemu from the ds2490 hardware and
+ reattaching would clear the problem. usbmon output in the guest and
+ host did not explain the problem. My guess is a bug in either qemu
+ or the host OS and more likely the host OS.
+-- 03-06-2008 David Fries <David@Fries.net>
--
1.4.4.4
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-13 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 12:23 [PATCH 0/35] W1: w1 core deadlock and oops fixes, ds2490 updates David Fries
2008-03-30 11:27 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-04-13 22:56 ` David Fries
2008-04-13 23:14 ` [PATCH 7/33 replaces 7/35] W1: feature, enable hardware strong pullup David Fries
2008-04-13 23:14 ` [PATCH 8/33 replaces 8/35 and 9/35] W1: feature, w1_therm.c use strong pullup and documentation David Fries
2008-04-13 23:14 ` [PATCH 9/33 replaces 10/35] W1: be able to manually add and remove slaves David Fries
2008-04-13 23:15 ` [PATCH 11/33 replaces 12/35] W1: new module parameter search_count David Fries
2008-04-13 23:15 ` [PATCH 12/33 replaces 13/35] W1: Document add, remove, search_count, and pullup David Fries
2008-04-13 23:15 ` [PATCH 13/33 replaces 14/35 and 15/35] W1: w1_slave_read_id multiple short read bug David Fries
2008-04-14 11:40 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-04-14 22:22 ` David Fries
2008-04-13 23:15 ` David Fries [this message]
2008-04-14 12:30 ` [PATCH 0/35] W1: w1 core deadlock and oops fixes, ds2490 updates Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080413231550.GG15213@spacedout.fries.net \
--to=david@fries.net \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome