* Re: [patch 02/19] x86: Use kbuild.h
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804161044250.12019@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
@ 2008-04-16 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-04-16 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter; +Cc: mingo, apw, sam, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > * Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Drop the macro definitions in asm-offsets_*.c and use kbuild.h
> > >
> > > thanks Christoph, applied.
> >
> > the dependency i missed was the existence of include/linux/kbuild.h ;-)
> > Anyway:
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> Yes sorry this is dependent on other patches merged by Andrew. This is the
> classic case of arch changes that depend on core changes.
Yeah, I tricked a few people that way yesterday ;)
For this series I cc'ed 30-odd people on the core patch
(add-kbuildh-that-contains-common-definitions-for-kbuild-users.patch) and
then cc'ed them individually on the dependent patch (eg,
sparc-use-kbuildh-instead-of-defining-macros-in-asm-offsetsc.patch). So
hopefully it was somewhat obvious what was going on.
In the case of *-use-get-put_unaligned_-helpers.patch it was more obscure
because the core patch
(kernel-add-common-infrastructure-for-unaligned-access.patch) came in a lot
earlier so nobody got to see it. That tricked 'em.
Perhaps I should put "depends on -mm's
kernel-add-common-infrastructure-for-unaligned-access.patch" in the
changelog. Problem is that I'd never remember to take that out before
sending the patch onwards.
I guess I could add "this depends on a patch which is only in -mm" into
that email somehow.
hm. Oh well, it doesn't happen very often.
Related:
I'm now sitting on things like:
kernel-add-common-infrastructure-for-unaligned-access.patch
...
input-use-get_unaligned_-helpers.patch
Strictly and formally, the merge process for these is
a) I send kernel-add-common-infrastructure-for-unaligned-access.patch to
Linus.
b) He merges it
c) I send input-use-get_unaligned_-helpers.patch to Dmitry
d) He merges it
e) He sends input-use-get_unaligned_-helpers.patch to Linus
f) Linus merges it.
This is a lot of fuss and there's a non-zero chance that we'll miss the
merge window. So I like people to send along acked-by's for this sort of
thing so I can scoot them along to Linus straight away.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-04-16 19:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20080414221808.269371488@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20080414221844.876647987@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20080416130128.GF6304@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20080416141023.GA25280@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804161044250.12019@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
2008-04-16 19:15 ` [patch 02/19] x86: Use kbuild.h Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®