mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: harvey.harrison@gmail.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] net: fix returning void-valued expression warnings
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:08:32 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080430.150832.107441339.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209593023.24729.117.camel@brick>

From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:03:43 -0700

> drivers/net/8390.c:37:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
> drivers/net/bnx2.c:1635:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> drivers/net/xen-netfront.c:1806:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
> net/ipv4/tcp_hybla.c:105:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> net/ipv4/tcp_vegas.c:171:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> net/ipv4/tcp_veno.c:123:3: warning: returning void-valued expression
> net/sysctl_net.c:85:2: warning: returning void-valued expression
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>

I wish this weren't marked with a warning, what spits this out,
sparse?

I know the kernel is written in C and not C++, but even Stroustrup
mentions this case explicitly in his book:

	 A void function cannot return a value.  However, a call of a
	 void function doesn't yield a value, so a void function can
	 use a call of a void function as the expression in a return
	 statement.

And I see no reason why there's anything wrong with this construct.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-30 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-30 22:03 Harvey Harrison
2008-04-30 22:08 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-04-30 22:20   ` Harvey Harrison
2008-04-30 22:21     ` David Miller
2008-05-01  3:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-30 23:31 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080430.150832.107441339.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®