From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Top 10 bugs/warnings for the week of March 23rd, 2008
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 00:23:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080524222304.GD20563@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4836EE8C.1010200@linux.intel.com>
Hello,
> Rank 3: mark_buffer_dirty
> Reported 253 times (547 total reports)
> EXT3 bug while hot-removing a USB device
> This oops was last seen in version 2.6.25.3, and first seen in
> 2.6.24-rc6.
> More info:
> http://www.kerneloops.org/searchweek.php?search=mark_buffer_dirty
Is someone looking into this? It could be somehow connected with commit
1be62dc190ebaca331038962c873e7967de6cc4b where we add smp_mb() to
mark_buffer_dirty() under some circumstances. But I don't really see
how. The WARN_ON() being triggered is !buffer_uptodate(bh) but that
seems ridiculous for call paths like ext2_sync_super() ->
mark_buffer_dirty() or journal_destroy() -> journal_update_superblock() ->
mark_buffer_dirty() which are in oopses. Also this warning started
appearing only recently while ext2 and JBD didn't change those areas
recently. Also interesting may be that both ext2_sync_super() and
journal_update_superblock() call sync_dirty_buffer() just after calling
mark_buffer_dirty()...
Arjan, do we have some more info for these oopses (like hw config,
what was the machine doing while the WARN_ON has been triggered etc.)?
Thanks.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-24 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-23 16:19 Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-23 16:23 ` Top 10 bugs/warnings for the week of May " Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-23 16:42 ` Top 10 bugs/warnings for the week of March " Linus Torvalds
2008-05-23 17:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-23 19:31 ` Alan Cox
2008-05-24 0:15 ` Chris Wright
2008-05-24 5:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-26 9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-24 5:32 ` Greg KH
2008-05-24 22:23 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2008-05-24 22:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-24 22:45 ` Theodore Tso
2008-05-25 11:58 ` Stefan Richter
2008-05-26 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 10:16 ` Theodore Tso
2008-05-26 10:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 16:20 ` Jan Kara
2008-05-26 16:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-26 17:01 ` Theodore Tso
2008-05-26 17:09 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-05-26 17:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2008-05-26 17:38 ` Jan Kara
2008-05-26 17:50 ` Theodore Tso
2008-05-26 18:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-27 6:12 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-05-27 11:41 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-27 3:49 ` Greg KH
2008-05-27 11:40 ` Pavel Machek
2008-05-26 14:52 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080524222304.GD20563@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®