mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Add rlimits to /proc/<PID>/status
@ 2008-05-30 20:11 Clifford Wolf
  2008-05-30 21:35 ` Hugh Dickins
  2008-05-30 21:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Clifford Wolf @ 2008-05-30 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lkml

Signed-off-by: Clifford Wolf <clifford@clifford.at>
---
 fs/proc/array.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
index 9e3b8c3..3cb2ad3 100644
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -242,6 +242,62 @@ static void collect_sigign_sigcatch(struct task_struct *p, sigset_t *ign,
 	}
 }
 
+static const char *rlim_names[RLIM_NLIMITS] = {
+	[RLIMIT_CPU]        = "CPU",
+	[RLIMIT_FSIZE]      = "FSize",
+	[RLIMIT_DATA]       = "Data",
+	[RLIMIT_STACK]      = "Stack",
+	[RLIMIT_CORE]       = "Core",
+	[RLIMIT_RSS]        = "RSS",
+	[RLIMIT_NPROC]      = "NProc",
+	[RLIMIT_NOFILE]     = "NoFile",
+	[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK]    = "MemLock",
+	[RLIMIT_AS]         = "AddrSpace",
+	[RLIMIT_LOCKS]      = "Locks",
+	[RLIMIT_SIGPENDING] = "SigPending",
+	[RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE]   = "MsgQueue",
+	[RLIMIT_NICE]       = "Nice",
+	[RLIMIT_RTPRIO]     = "RTPrio",
+	[RLIMIT_RTTIME]     = "RTTime"
+};
+
+#if RLIM_NLIMITS != 16
+#  error Value of RLIM_NLIMITS changed. \
+         Please update rlim_names in fs/proc/array.c
+#endif
+
+static inline void task_rlim(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct rlimit rlim[RLIM_NLIMITS];
+	int i;
+
+	for (i=0; i<RLIM_NLIMITS; i++) {
+		rlim[i].rlim_cur = 0;
+		rlim[i].rlim_max = 0;
+	}
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	if (lock_task_sighand(p, &flags)) {
+		for (i=0; i<RLIM_NLIMITS; i++)
+			rlim[i] = p->signal->rlim[i];
+		unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	for (i=0; i<RLIM_NLIMITS; i++) {
+		seq_printf(m, "Rlim%s:\t", rlim_names[i]);
+		if (rlim[i].rlim_cur != RLIM_INFINITY)
+			seq_printf(m, "%lu\t", rlim[i].rlim_cur);
+		else
+			seq_printf(m, "inf\t");
+		if (rlim[i].rlim_max != RLIM_INFINITY)
+			seq_printf(m, "%lu\n", rlim[i].rlim_max);
+		else
+			seq_printf(m, "inf\n");
+	}
+}
+
 static inline void task_sig(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -322,6 +378,7 @@ int proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 		task_mem(m, mm);
 		mmput(mm);
 	}
+	task_rlim(m, task);
 	task_sig(m, task);
 	task_cap(m, task);
 	cpuset_task_status_allowed(m, task);
-- 
1.5.5.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Add rlimits to /proc/<PID>/status
  2008-05-30 20:11 [PATCH] Add rlimits to /proc/<PID>/status Clifford Wolf
@ 2008-05-30 21:35 ` Hugh Dickins
  2008-05-30 22:50   ` Clifford Wolf
  2008-05-30 21:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2008-05-30 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Clifford Wolf; +Cc: lkml

Aren't they better staying in /proc/<PID>/limits?

Hugh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Add rlimits to /proc/<PID>/status
  2008-05-30 20:11 [PATCH] Add rlimits to /proc/<PID>/status Clifford Wolf
  2008-05-30 21:35 ` Hugh Dickins
@ 2008-05-30 21:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2008-05-30 21:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Clifford Wolf; +Cc: lkml

On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 22:11 +0200, Clifford Wolf wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Clifford Wolf <clifford@clifford.at>
> ---
>  fs/proc/array.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c
> index 9e3b8c3..3cb2ad3 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/array.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/array.c
> @@ -242,6 +242,62 @@ static void collect_sigign_sigcatch(struct task_struct *p, sigset_t *ign,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static const char *rlim_names[RLIM_NLIMITS] = {
> +	[RLIMIT_CPU]        = "CPU",
> +	[RLIMIT_FSIZE]      = "FSize",
> +	[RLIMIT_DATA]       = "Data",
> +	[RLIMIT_STACK]      = "Stack",
> +	[RLIMIT_CORE]       = "Core",
> +	[RLIMIT_RSS]        = "RSS",
> +	[RLIMIT_NPROC]      = "NProc",
> +	[RLIMIT_NOFILE]     = "NoFile",
> +	[RLIMIT_MEMLOCK]    = "MemLock",
> +	[RLIMIT_AS]         = "AddrSpace",
> +	[RLIMIT_LOCKS]      = "Locks",
> +	[RLIMIT_SIGPENDING] = "SigPending",
> +	[RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE]   = "MsgQueue",
> +	[RLIMIT_NICE]       = "Nice",
> +	[RLIMIT_RTPRIO]     = "RTPrio",
> +	[RLIMIT_RTTIME]     = "RTTime"
> +};

fs/proc/base.c already has an array with strings in it


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Add rlimits to /proc/<PID>/status
  2008-05-30 21:35 ` Hugh Dickins
@ 2008-05-30 22:50   ` Clifford Wolf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Clifford Wolf @ 2008-05-30 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hugh Dickins; +Cc: lkml

Hi,

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:35:27PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Aren't they better staying in /proc/<PID>/limits?

this was a cleanup of a patch I've sent to lkml about 6 months ago
when there was no yet-released (non-rc) kernel with /proc/<PID>/limits ...

my patch is a more or less duplicate of commit d85f50d5. oops.
please simply ignore it..  ;-)

yours,
 - clifford

-- 
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?"
Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked
a bit off."

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-30 23:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-30 20:11 [PATCH] Add rlimits to /proc/<PID>/status Clifford Wolf
2008-05-30 21:35 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-05-30 22:50   ` Clifford Wolf
2008-05-30 21:46 ` Peter Zijlstra

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®