From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/8] vfs: annotate permission operations
Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 04:23:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080531082356.GE24135@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080529113314.181992948@szeredi.hu>
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:32:50PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
>
> Add more PERM_OP_ flags to permission() calls. This allows
> filesystems like NFS and security modules like AppArmor to make
> precise decisions about whent permissions need to be checked, and when
> they will be checked later together with the actual operation.
Where the heck does this PERM_OP crap come from? More MAY_ flags make
sense in some cases, but we should introduce them on a per-need basis
(e.g. to replace lookup intents in many cases), and without a new
PERM_OP_ namespace.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-31 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-29 11:32 [patch 0/8] vfs: more cleanups and fixes Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-29 11:32 ` [patch 1/8] vfs: dcache cleanups Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-29 12:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-31 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-29 11:32 ` [patch 2/8] vfs: fix sys_getcwd for detached mounts Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-31 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-29 11:32 ` [patch 3/8] Make d_path() consistent across mount operations Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-31 8:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-01 20:38 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-06-02 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-29 11:32 ` [patch 4/8] nfsd: rename MAY_ flags Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-29 12:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-29 14:02 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-29 20:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-30 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-30 9:07 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-30 9:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-30 20:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-05-29 11:32 ` [patch 5/8] vfs: annotate permission operations Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-31 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-05-29 11:32 ` [patch 6/8] Factor out sysctl pathname code Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-31 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-03 13:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2008-05-29 11:32 ` [patch 7/8] vfs: clean up getattr API Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-29 11:32 ` [patch 8/8] vfs: create file_remove_suid() helper Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-31 8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-01 20:45 ` Miklos Szeredi
2008-06-02 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-02 7:06 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080531082356.GE24135@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®