Re: m68k libc5 regression

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 11:22:05 +0200 Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:48:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 10:37:59 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > I shall merge this fix into my tree (y'know - the one where memory
> > > > management patches are hosted) and I'll get it into 2.6.26 and shall
> > > > offer it to the -stable team.  This will cause me to get collisions
> > > > with the duplicated patch in linux-next but fortunately it is small. 
> > > > This time.
> > > 
> > > So what's the appropriate way to handle this?
> > 
> > Well at least please reply letting people know what's happening with it.
> > 
> > Ask me to merge it and remind me that it's needed in -stable.  Or just
> > send the thing to Linus and -stable immediately.
> 
> I recall adding:
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> 
> will automagically tell the stable team when this is
> merged and that it is a -stable candidate.
> 

Yup.  Except I always use the <> wrappers around the email address.  In
fact my scripts require that (and probably shouldn't).  We don't seem
very consistent with that.