From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps & ldisc
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:15:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080601161510.GA26854@enneenne.com> (raw)
Hello,
I write to both of you since my questions are related. :)
My last modifications to LinuxPPS are focused on adding a PPS ldisc
and a low-level IRQs timestamps recording.
First I added a new dcd_change() ldisc method which can be used as
follow:
static void pps_tty_dcd_change(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned int status)
{
int id = (int) tty->disc_data;
struct timespec __ts;
struct pps_ktime ts;
/* First of all we get the time stamp... */
getnstimeofday(&__ts);
/* ... and translate it to PPS time data struct */
ts.sec = __ts.tv_sec;
ts.nsec = __ts.tv_nsec;
/* Now do the PPS event report */
pps_event(id, &ts,
status ? PPS_CAPTUREASSERT : PPS_CAPTURECLEAR, tty);
pr_debug("[STDev] PPS %s at %lu on source #%d\n",
status ? "assert" : "clear", jiffies, id);
}
However this solution gives very low precision timestamps so that's
why I propose to add the following code to register IRQ timestamps as
soon as possible (here the code for x86_32 architecture):
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
index d3fde94..a3b8457 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/pps.h>
#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -25,6 +26,11 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(irq_stat);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs *, irq_regs);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(irq_regs);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPS_IRQ_EVENTS
+struct pps_ktime pps_irq_ts[NR_IRQS];
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pps_irq_ts);
+#endif
+
/*
* 'what should we do if we get a hw irq event on an illegal vector'.
* each architecture has to answer this themselves.
@@ -76,6 +82,12 @@ fastcall unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
union irq_ctx *curctx, *irqctx;
u32 *isp;
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPS_IRQ_EVENTS
+ struct timespec __ts;
+
+ /* Get IRQ timestamps as soon as possible for the PPS layer */
+ getnstimeofday(&__ts);
+#endif
if (unlikely((unsigned)irq >= NR_IRQS)) {
printk(KERN_EMERG "%s: cannot handle IRQ %d\n",
@@ -83,6 +95,12 @@ fastcall unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
BUG();
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPS_IRQ_EVENTS
+ /* Then, after sanity check, store the IRQ timestamp */
+ pps_irq_ts[irq].sec = __ts.tv_sec;
+ pps_irq_ts[irq].nsec = __ts.tv_nsec;
+#endif
+
old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
irq_enter();
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
This allow the following modifications to the dcd_change() method:
static void pps_tty_dcd_change(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned int irq,
unsigned int status)
{
int id = (int) tty->disc_data;
pps_event(id, &pps_irq_ts[irq],
status ? PPS_CAPTUREASSERT : PPS_CAPTURECLEAR, tty);
pr_debug("[IRQev] PPS %s at %lu on source #%d\n",
status ? "assert" : "clear", jiffies, id);
}
Note that in this case I need also the "irq" parameter.
This solution gives very high timestamps precision! Better that
before! :D
What do you think about this solution? More precisely:
1) The low-level IRQ patch can be acceptable?
2) The new dcd_change() method is well implemented? Can I add the
"irq" parameter or I can find it somewhere?
Thanks a lot for your suggestions,
Rodolfo
--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming skype: rodolfo.giometti
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-01 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-01 16:15 Rodolfo Giometti [this message]
2008-06-01 19:26 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-06-02 6:51 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 9:25 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-02 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 14:56 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-02 15:48 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 17:22 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-02 19:35 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 20:21 ` Matti Aarnio
2008-06-03 13:40 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 17:09 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-06-02 16:59 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080601161510.GA26854@enneenne.com \
--to=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®