From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
To: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps & ldisc
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 23:21:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080602202135.GF3700@mea-ext.zmailer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080602172203.GI26854@enneenne.com>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:22:03PM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
...
> In the past we noticed that just moving up the getnstimeofday() of
> only one instruction, from:
>
> port->icount.dcd++;
> getnstimeofday(&ts);
>
> to:
>
> getnstimeofday(&ts);
> port->icount.dcd++;
>
> the time precision improved from 5ms to 2ms...
Perhaps I am looking for unattainable.. but I have HP/Agilent 58534A
(a.k.a Symmetricom 58534A) "GPS Timing Antenna", which specifications
are telling that it should attain 1PPS timing jitter of less than 40 ns
in proper stabilized position hold mode.
Can that level be handled with standard PC hardware, or should the time
keeping and core parts of NTP be delegated into FPGA entirely ?
Stratum-1 is rather demanding, after all...
> However, if you prefere that I add the if clause, I'll do it.
> Thanks,
> Rodolfo
Thanks, Matti
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-02 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-01 16:15 Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-01 19:26 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-06-02 6:51 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 9:25 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-02 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 14:56 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-02 15:48 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 17:22 ` Rodolfo Giometti
2008-06-02 19:35 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 20:21 ` Matti Aarnio [this message]
2008-06-03 13:40 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-02 17:09 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-06-02 16:59 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080602202135.GF3700@mea-ext.zmailer.org \
--to=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=giometti@enneenne.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®