From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
To: "Klaus S. Madsen" <ubuntu@hjernemadsen.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Short <zulcss@ubuntu.com>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hdaps add support for various IBM thinkpads R61/T61/T61P
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:27:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080613122751.GF7212@baikonur.stro.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080613114002.GJ30713@42.dk>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 01:40:02PM +0200, Klaus S. Madsen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 13:26:47 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.c b/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.c
> > index 26df06f..e07c712 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/hdaps.c
> > @@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata hdaps_whitelist[] = {
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad R50"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad R51"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad R52"),
> > + HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad R61"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_INVERT("LENOVO", "ThinkPad R61i"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_INVERT("IBM", "ThinkPad T41p"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad T41"),
> > @@ -523,6 +524,8 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata hdaps_whitelist[] = {
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad T43"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_INVERT("LENOVO", "ThinkPad T60"),
> > HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_INVERT("LENOVO", "ThinkPad T61"),
> > + HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad T61"),
> > + HDAPS_DMI_MATCH_NORMAL("IBM", "ThinkPad T61P"),
> I would suspect that this part of the patch is unnecessary. It would be
> strange if there are any T61's where the manufacturer is IBM, instead of
> LENOVO, since the T60 is older and has the manufacturer listed as
> LENOVO, and no entry exists for IBM.
>
> But according to the comment at the top of the struct, the second line
> (the T61P part) is unnecessary, as a T61p already would be matched by
> the T61 line.
according to hardy git there is no bug reference, but the T61p got added
before the T61 both by chuck. could you enlighten us please on the T61
IBM match need?
thanks
--
maks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-13 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-13 11:26 maximilian attems
2008-06-13 11:40 ` Klaus S. Madsen
2008-06-13 12:27 ` maximilian attems [this message]
2008-06-13 12:45 ` Klaus S. Madsen
2008-06-13 13:21 ` Jean Delvare
2008-06-13 13:21 ` maximilian attems
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080613122751.GF7212@baikonur.stro.at \
--to=max@stro.at \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=ubuntu@hjernemadsen.org \
--cc=zulcss@ubuntu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®