From: Komuro <komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
jgarzik@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pcmcia <linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org>,
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [KERNEL 2.6.26-rc4] bugreport : pata_pcmcia with Sandisk Extreme III 8GB
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:23:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080618212358.c9bbf3fd.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4857C590.6050002@gmail.com>
Hi,
Here is the log.
My card is single function device.
it is correct that GetNextTuple fails for pcmcia0.1.
since pcmcia0.1 does not exist.
I think the reason of this problem is
memory-leak or something.
pcmcia: registering new device pcmcia0.0
pata_pcmcia 0.0: XXX ENTER
pata_pcmcia 0.0: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.0: XXX resource loop, pass=0
scsi2 : pata_pcmcia
ata3: PATA max PIO0 cmd 0xd100 ctl 0xd10e irq 4
ata3.00: CFA: , Ver.1.0, max PIO2
ata3.00: 32000 sectors, multi 0: LBA
ata3.00: configured for PIO0
ata3.00: configured for PIO0
ata3: EH complete
isa bounce pool size: 16 pages
scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA Ver. PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] 32000 512-byte hardware sectors (16 MB)
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] 32000 512-byte hardware sectors (16 MB)
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
sdb: sdb1
sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
pata_pcmcia 0.0: XXX LEAVE 0
pcmcia: registering new device pcmcia0.1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX ENTER
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 0:0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=0, doing GetFirstTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
0.1: GetNextTuple: No more items
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX LEAVE -12
pata_pcmcia: probe of 0.1 failed with error -12
modprobe used greatest stack depth: 1676 bytes left
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX ENTER
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=0, doing GetFirstTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
0.1: GetNextTuple: No more items
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX LEAVE -12
pata_pcmcia: probe of 0.1 failed with error -12
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX ENTER
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=0, doing GetFirstTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 2 0:16 376:0
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 1f0:8 3f6:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX resource loop, pass=1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX IO request failed 1 170:8 376:1
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX pass=1, doing GetNextTuple
0.1: GetNextTuple: No more items
pata_pcmcia 0.1: XXX LEAVE -12
pata_pcmcia: probe of 0.1 failed with error -12
Best Regards
Komuro
> Okay. The exit is from CS_CHECK macro on GetNextTuple, missed that
> macro. It means it failed to request IO resource somewhere. Can you
> please try the attached patch? It will show us where it failed.
>
> This part of code hasn't changed at all in pata_pcmcia && I don't really
> understand the tuple business. We need pcmcia people to pitch in.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-18 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080528225049.9a134e0d.Kristoffer.Ericson@Gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20080528222740.GB20893@isilmar.linta.de>
[not found] ` <20080530135728.be02d3dc.Kristoffer.Ericson@Gmail.com>
2008-06-07 13:37 ` Komuro
2008-06-11 7:20 ` Dominik Brodowski
2008-06-14 3:00 ` Komuro
2008-06-14 7:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-14 12:36 ` Komuro
2008-06-16 3:07 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-16 13:11 ` Komuro
2008-06-16 13:24 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-17 12:23 ` Komuro
2008-06-17 14:09 ` Tejun Heo
2008-06-17 14:15 ` Dominik Brodowski
2008-06-18 12:23 ` Komuro [this message]
2008-07-06 1:37 ` Komuro
2008-07-06 14:19 ` Tejun Heo
2008-07-07 12:42 ` Komuro
2008-07-09 4:10 ` Tejun Heo
2008-07-12 2:39 ` Komuro
2008-06-22 1:07 ` Komuro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080618212358.c9bbf3fd.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com \
--to=komurojun-mbn@nifty.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®