mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mpatocka@redhat.com
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: stack overflow on Sparc64
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:51:39 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080620.215139.218732028.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620.144128.32005196.davem@davemloft.net>

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:41:28 -0700 (PDT)

> Next week I'll make one of my primary projects the implementation of
> IRQ stacks for sparc64.

Next week came real fast :-)

Amazingly this patch worked the first time I booted it up on my
dual-cpu workstation (using SMP + PREEMPT).  I'm worried that maybe
gcc can do some clever things and not allow my extremely simple
approach to work, but anyways it might work for you and it's worth
giving a try.

sparc64: Implement support for IRQ stacks.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/arch/sparc64/Kconfig.debug b/arch/sparc64/Kconfig.debug
index 6a4d28a..df80962 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/sparc64/Kconfig.debug
@@ -41,4 +41,11 @@ config FRAME_POINTER
 	depends on MCOUNT
 	default y
 
+config IRQSTACKS
+	bool "Use separate kernel stacks when processing interrupts"
+	help
+	  If you say Y here the kernel will use separate kernel stacks
+	  for handling hard and soft interrupts.  This can help avoid
+	  overflowing the process kernel stacks.
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/irq.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/irq.c
index b441a26..24820fa 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/irq.c
@@ -674,10 +674,42 @@ void ack_bad_irq(unsigned int virt_irq)
 	       ino, virt_irq);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSTACKS
+void *hardirq_stack[NR_CPUS];
+void *softirq_stack[NR_CPUS];
+
+static void *set_hardirq_stack(void)
+{
+	void *orig_sp, *sp = hardirq_stack[smp_processor_id()];
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__("mov %%sp, %0" : "=r" (orig_sp));
+	if (orig_sp < sp ||
+	    orig_sp > (sp + THREAD_SIZE)) {
+		sp += THREAD_SIZE - 192 - STACK_BIAS;
+		__asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, %%sp" : : "r" (sp));
+	}
+
+	return orig_sp;
+}
+static void restore_hardirq_stack(void *orig_sp)
+{
+	__asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, %%sp" : : "r" (orig_sp));
+}
+#else
+static void *set_hardirq_stack(void)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+static void restore_hardirq_stack(void *orig_sp)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
 void handler_irq(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	unsigned long pstate, bucket_pa;
 	struct pt_regs *old_regs;
+	void *orig_sp;
 
 	clear_softint(1 << irq);
 
@@ -695,6 +727,8 @@ void handler_irq(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			       "i" (PSTATE_IE)
 			     : "memory");
 
+	orig_sp = set_hardirq_stack();
+
 	while (bucket_pa) {
 		struct irq_desc *desc;
 		unsigned long next_pa;
@@ -711,10 +745,40 @@ void handler_irq(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		bucket_pa = next_pa;
 	}
 
+	restore_hardirq_stack(orig_sp);
+
 	irq_exit();
 	set_irq_regs(old_regs);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSTACKS
+void do_softirq(void)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (in_interrupt())
+		return;
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+
+	if (local_softirq_pending()) {
+		void *orig_sp, *sp = softirq_stack[smp_processor_id()];
+
+		sp += THREAD_SIZE - 192 - STACK_BIAS;
+
+		__asm__ __volatile__("mov %%sp, %0\n\t"
+				     "mov %1, %%sp"
+				     : "=&r" (orig_sp)
+				     : "r" (sp));
+		__do_softirq();
+		__asm__ __volatile__("mov %0, %%sp"
+				     : : "r" (orig_sp));
+	}
+
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
 void fixup_irqs(void)
 {
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/mm/init.c b/arch/sparc64/mm/init.c
index 84898c4..56e22f4 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/mm/init.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
 #include <asm/sstate.h>
 #include <asm/mdesc.h>
 #include <asm/cpudata.h>
+#include <asm/irq.h>
 
 #define MAX_PHYS_ADDRESS	(1UL << 42UL)
 #define KPTE_BITMAP_CHUNK_SZ	(256UL * 1024UL * 1024UL)
@@ -1817,6 +1818,18 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
 	if (tlb_type == hypervisor)
 		sun4v_mdesc_init();
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSTACKS
+	/* Once the OF device tree and MDESC have been setup, we know
+	 * the list of possible cpus.  Therefore we can allocate the
+	 * IRQ stacks.
+	 */
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		/* XXX Use node local allocations... XXX */
+		softirq_stack[i] = __va(lmb_alloc(THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE));
+		hardirq_stack[i] = __va(lmb_alloc(THREAD_SIZE, THREAD_SIZE));
+	}
+#endif
+
 	/* Setup bootmem... */
 	last_valid_pfn = end_pfn = bootmem_init(phys_base);
 
diff --git a/include/asm-sparc64/irq.h b/include/asm-sparc64/irq.h
index 0bb9bf5..d71b5ff 100644
--- a/include/asm-sparc64/irq.h
+++ b/include/asm-sparc64/irq.h
@@ -90,4 +90,10 @@ static inline unsigned long get_softint(void)
 	return retval;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_IRQSTACKS
+extern void *hardirq_stack[NR_CPUS];
+extern void *softirq_stack[NR_CPUS];
+#define __ARCH_HAS_DO_SOFTIRQ
+#endif
+
 #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-21  4:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-18  0:47 Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-18  4:01 ` David Miller
2008-06-19  3:24   ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-19  3:59     ` David Miller
2008-06-19  5:17       ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-19  6:37         ` David Miller
2008-06-19 13:01           ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 15:47   ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 17:26     ` David Miller
2008-06-20 20:34       ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 20:37         ` David Miller
2008-06-20 21:26           ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 21:41             ` David Miller
2008-06-21  4:51               ` David Miller [this message]
2008-06-21 19:42                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-22  7:03                   ` David Miller
2008-06-22 13:48                     ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-08-12  6:30                   ` David Miller
2008-08-12  8:22                     ` David Miller
2008-08-13  0:53                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-08-13  0:59                         ` David Miller
2008-08-13  1:11                     ` console handover badness [was: stack overflow on Sparc64] Mikulas Patocka
2008-08-13  1:22                       ` console handover badness David Miller
2008-08-13  1:40                       ` David Miller
2008-08-13  8:50                         ` David Miller
2008-08-13 12:46                         ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-08-14  3:25                           ` David Miller
2008-08-14 23:11                             ` Bootmem allocator broken [was: console handover badness] Mikulas Patocka
2008-08-14 23:25                               ` Bootmem allocator broken David Miller
2008-08-15 11:09                                 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-08-15 21:13                                   ` David Miller
2008-08-14 23:40                               ` Johannes Weiner
2008-06-20 21:14       ` stack overflow on Sparc64 Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 21:20         ` David Miller
2008-06-20 21:25           ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 21:44             ` David Miller
2008-06-20 21:47               ` David Miller
2008-06-20 22:22                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 22:28                   ` David Miller
2008-06-20 22:36                     ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 22:47                       ` David Miller
2008-06-21  0:37                         ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-06-20 22:33               ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080620.215139.218732028.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®