From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:20:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080627085032.GA17412@dirshya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080627170514.7A88.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> [2008-06-27 17:08:22]:
> Hi
>
> > Advantages:
> >
> > * Enterprise workloads on large hardware configurations may need
> > aggressive consolidation strategy
> > * Performance impact on server is different from desktop or laptops.
> > Interactivity is less of a concern on large enterprise servers while
> > workload response times and performance per watt is more significant
> > * Aggressive power savings even with marginal performance penalty is
> > is a useful tunable for servers since it may provide good
> > performance-per-watt at low utilisation
> > * This tunable can influence other parts of scheduler like wakeup
> > biasing for overall task consolidation
>
> I'd like to know how many saving power.
> if there are only small saving, I think this is not interesting feature.
>
> Do you expect how many percentage saving?
The power savings depends on the number of sockets. With the present
hardware on servers, we are seeing very small power savings. However
deep sleep states and wide variation in CPU power consumption in
future will increase the percentage. The percentage may be around
1 to 5 percent. Given the system utilisation pattern and large number
of systems idle in a datacenter, this is not an insignificant number.
The power value can be significant in a 4 socket or larger system
configuration.
--Vaidy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-27 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-25 19:11 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-26 13:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-26 15:01 ` Dipankar Sarma
2008-06-26 18:31 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-26 15:01 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-26 18:08 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-26 18:52 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-26 19:37 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-06-27 6:50 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-26 20:17 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-26 21:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
2008-06-26 21:37 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-26 21:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-26 22:38 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-27 6:24 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-27 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-27 8:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-28 11:35 ` Tim Connors
2008-06-28 11:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-28 12:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-28 12:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-28 12:53 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-06-28 11:22 ` Tim Connors
2008-06-29 18:02 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-06-30 4:57 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-30 5:55 ` Tim Connors
2008-06-30 14:18 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-06-30 14:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-27 4:54 ` Dipankar Sarma
2008-06-27 8:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-30 16:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2008-06-27 7:19 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-06-27 4:15 ` Balbir Singh
2008-06-27 8:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-06-27 8:50 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2008-06-27 12:54 ` David Collier-Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080627085032.GA17412@dirshya.in.ibm.com \
--to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®