mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mpatocka@redhat.com
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [SUGGESTION]: drop virtual merge accounting in I/O requests
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:31:16 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080714.183116.121978835.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807141903001.2825@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:16:17 -0400 (EDT)

> So the question is: to reduce number of requests by 12% on an outdated 
> SCSI card, it is sensible to maintain complicated merge accounting logic 
> in the core block layer? To me, it doesn't seem sensible.

Rip out the code if you like, then.  I really don't have time to
work on this myself.  So if you do, by all means do whatever
you think is appropriate.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-15  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-10 21:56 Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-10 22:59 ` Julian Calaby
2008-07-10 23:57   ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-11  6:20 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-11 10:52   ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-11 11:15     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-11 19:41       ` David Miller
2008-07-11 20:22         ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-12 12:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-13 13:34   ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-13 13:50     ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-13 19:46       ` David Miller
2008-07-13 20:13         ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-13 23:53           ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-14  0:48             ` David Miller
2008-07-14 12:16               ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-14 12:28                 ` David Miller
2008-07-14 14:03                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-14 21:37                     ` David Miller
2008-07-14 23:16                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15  1:31                         ` David Miller [this message]
2008-07-15 22:32                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15 22:37                             ` David Miller
2008-07-15 22:59                               ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15  2:40                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-14  0:41           ` David Miller
2008-07-14  2:19             ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-14  3:20               ` David Miller
2008-07-14 17:45                 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-14 21:26                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15  2:40                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-15 12:09                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15 12:15                         ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-15 13:16                           ` Mikulas Patocka
2008-07-15 14:06                             ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-15 12:19                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-07-16  3:10                   ` David Miller
2008-07-16  4:38                     ` FUJITA Tomonori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080714.183116.121978835.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome