From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PAGE_ALIGN() compile breakage
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:14:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080725091455.GD19310@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080725015537.564e3397.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 01:55:37AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:39:43 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Commit 27ac792ca0b0a1e7e65f20342260650516c95864
> > (PAGE_ALIGN(): correctly handle 64-bit values on 32-bit architectures)
> > causes on some architectures (e.g. avr32 and mips) compile errors
> > like the following in some configurations starting with:
> >
> > <-- snip -->
> >
> > ...
> > CC init/main.o
> > In file included from
> > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/utsname.h:35,
> > from /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/init/main.c:20:
> > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h: In function 'arch_pick_mmap_layout':
> > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h:2149: error: implicit declaration of function 'PAGE_ALIGN'
> > make[2]: *** [init/main.o] Error 1
> >
>
> pls test:
>
> diff -puN include/linux/sched.h~a include/linux/sched.h
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h~a
> +++ a/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2139,16 +2139,7 @@ static inline void set_task_cpu(struct t
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT
> extern void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm);
> -#else
> -static inline void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm)
> -{
> - mm->mmap_base = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
> - mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area;
> - mm->unmap_area = arch_unmap_area;
> -}
> -#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
> extern void
> diff -puN mm/mmap.c~a mm/mmap.c
> --- a/mm/mmap.c~a
> +++ a/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2268,3 +2268,12 @@ int install_special_mapping(struct mm_st
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT
> +void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + mm->mmap_base = TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE;
> + mm->get_unmapped_area = arch_get_unmapped_area;
> + mm->unmap_area = arch_unmap_area;
> +}
> +#endif
Nice, this seems to fix the problem.
> > and more nasty problems follow later.
> >
> > My suggestion is to:
> > - revert commit 27ac792ca0b0a1e7e65f20342260650516c95864 and then
> > - fix all PAGE_ALIGN() instances without moving them.
>
> Every time this patch blew up (and it did it often), fixing it resulted
> in overall improvements.
>
> > Unifying code is a good thing, but in this case it is not worth the
> > trouble it causes by poking into the heart of our headers mess.
>
> Well. If we leave it a mess, it'll stay a mess.
An interesting question is whether the PAGE_ALIGN() move makes the mess
bigger or smaller.
Ideally, all headers should be self-contained. IOW, they should #include
everything they use.
But TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE in asm/processor.h on some architectures uses
PAGE_ALIGN() that got moved from asm/page.h to linux/mm.h .
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-25 8:39 Adrian Bunk
2008-07-25 8:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-25 9:14 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-07-25 9:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-25 18:34 ` Andrea Righi
2008-07-25 9:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-07-25 9:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-25 12:24 ` __weak vs ifdef Matthew Wilcox
2008-07-25 12:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-26 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-02-18 2:07 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-18 2:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-26 21:22 ` [-mm patch] mm/util.c must #include <linux/sched.h> Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080725091455.GD19310@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®