mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the broken COMEMPCI code
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 10:01:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080829070103.GD16462@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B77764.6060607@snapgear.com>

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 02:13:24PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 04:16:12PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>
>>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>>> There exists blackfin hardware with PCI support, but the support
>>>> currently in the kernel fails to build starting with:
>>>>
>>>> <--  snip  -->
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>   CC      init/main.o
>>>> In file included from dma-mapping.h:5,
>>>>                  from dma-mapping.h:52,
>>>>                  from dmaengine.h:29,
>>>>                  from skbuff.h:29,
>>>>                  from netlink.h:155,
>>>>                  from genetlink.h:4,
>>>>                  from genetlink.h:4,
>>>>                  from taskstats_kern.h:12,
>>>>                  from main.c:46:
>>>> dma-mapping.h: In function 'dma_supported': ma-mapping.h:24: error: 
>>>> implicit declaration of function 'pci_dma_supported'
>>>> ...
>>>> make[2]: *** [init/main.o] Error 1
>>> I think we should just remove the underlying comempci access
>>> code which is the only user of this (arch/m68knommu/kernel/comempci.c).
>>> Nobody has used it in a very long time. And the hardware itself is
>>> old, and completely brain-damaged by design.
>>
>> A patch for removing the comempci code is below.
>>
>> It's a bit suspicious that asm/elia.h is now removed since comempci.c  
>> was the only user. What's the sttus of the eLIA platform?
>
> Only ever a handful where made, and that was in 1999.
> I doubt anyone could ever use the PCI interface on it
> in any useful way.

So I can send a patch to remove the platform?

>> But COMEMPCI fails with a different error - this init/main.o build 
>> error is present for CONFIG_PCI=y, CONFIG_COMEMPCI=n, so the dependency 
>> of PCI on BROKEN is still required (unless it gets fixed).
>
> Unless I am mistaken there is now no need for the CONFIG_PCI option
> if selecting m68knommu. The only m68knommu platforms that had PCI
> as far as I know where those that use the comempci part.

That implies I can also kill the m68k PCI code since m68knommu will 
never use it?

> The patch looks ok to me too (acked below).

Thanks.

> Regards
> Greg
>...

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-29  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-19 13:47 [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN Adrian Bunk
2008-08-19 14:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-08-19 14:32   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-19 15:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-22  3:44   ` Bryan Wu
2008-08-25  6:16 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-08-25 20:43   ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the broken COMEMPCI code Adrian Bunk
2008-08-29  4:13     ` Greg Ungerer
2008-08-29  7:01       ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-08-29  7:31         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-08-31 16:10           ` [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code Adrian Bunk
2008-09-03  7:22             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-06 12:23             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-09  5:06               ` Jesse Barnes
2008-09-09  7:11                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-25 13:31               ` Adrian Bunk
2008-08-29 11:07         ` [RFC: 2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the broken COMEMPCI code Greg Ungerer
2008-08-31 16:10           ` [2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the eLIA support Adrian Bunk
2008-08-31 16:10       ` [2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the unused PCI option Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080829070103.GD16462@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi \
    --to=bunk@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®