mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, greg@kroah.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, miklos@szeredi.hu
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:38:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080901073844.GA5376@glandium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87iqtggwng.fsf@frosties.localdomain>

On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 09:20:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
> Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 02:30:32PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Yeah, compared to loopback over FUSE, anything would have less
> >> problem. :-) I don't know much about nbd but it's pretty much solving
> >> the same problem so I think it's logical to extend nbd including
> >> giving it a new transport if necessary?  Or is there something
> >> fundamentally better when it's done via FUSE?
> >
> > My gutt feeling is that it would have less overhead when done via FUSE
> > than through nbd, but that could be wrong.
> >
> > Mike
> 
> What I would hope is that BUSE would add some zero copy transport in
> there. A way to just redirect the BIOs from the BUSE device to other
> block devices without copying the data around.
> 
> But maybe BUSE is a bad name for that. That would be more a DUSE -
> Device mapper in USEr space.

That already exists. http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/DmUserspace

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-01  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-28 18:18 Tejun Heo
2008-08-28 18:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] FUSE: add fuse_ prefix to several functions Tejun Heo
2008-08-28 18:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] FUSE: export symbols to be used by CUSE Tejun Heo
2008-08-28 18:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] FUSE: separate out fuse_conn_init() from new_conn() Tejun Heo
2008-08-28 18:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] FUSE: add fuse_conn->release() Tejun Heo
2008-08-28 18:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] CUSE: implement CUSE - Character device in Userspace Tejun Heo
2008-08-28 20:07   ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-28 22:15     ` Greg KH
2008-08-28 22:32       ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-29  2:09     ` Tejun Heo
2008-08-29  2:20       ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-29 15:27       ` Nick Bowler
2008-08-29  5:50 ` [fuse-devel] [PATCHSET] CUSE: implement CUSE Mike Hommey
2008-08-29  5:52   ` Tejun Heo
2008-08-29 18:50     ` Archie Cobbs
2008-08-30 12:30       ` Tejun Heo
2008-08-30 18:56         ` Mike Hommey
2008-09-01  7:20           ` Goswin von Brederlow
2008-09-01  7:38             ` Mike Hommey [this message]
2008-08-30 22:39         ` Archie Cobbs
2008-08-31  4:52   ` hooanon05
2008-08-30 16:35 ` Goswin von Brederlow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080901073844.GA5376@glandium.org \
    --to=mh@glandium.org \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome