From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/inotify.h: do not include <linux/fcntl.h> in userspace
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:32:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080917093240.GB4984@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080916160902.GF1400@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 960 bytes --]
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 07:10:25AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > >> What is the error message?
> > >
> > > /usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:117: error: redefinition of 'struct
> > > flock'
> >
> > And? None of these programs should use <linux/inotify.h>. There has
> > for the longest time been a <sys/inotify.h> header which doesn't need
> > any kernel headers. In fact, <linux/inotify.h> should not be exported.
>
> Even if userspace applications shouldn't use it directly this doesn't
> sound right:
>
> We shouldn't force all libc implementations to copy the contents into a
> private header.
glibc and dietlibc provide <sys/inotify.h>. newlib and uclibc don't. klibc
provides <sys/inotify.h> but it depends on <linux/inotify.h>
--
Regards, Kirill A. Shutemov
+ Belarus, Minsk
+ ALT Linux Team, http://www.altlinux.com/
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-17 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-16 12:22 Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-09-16 12:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-09-16 13:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-09-16 13:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-09-16 14:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-09-16 14:43 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-09-16 16:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-09-17 9:32 ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2008-09-17 10:04 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2008-09-17 10:12 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080917093240.GB4984@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®