Re: [PATCH,RFC] RCU-based detection of stalled CPUs for Classic RCU

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> This patch adds stalled-CPU detection to Classic RCU.  This capability 
> is enabled by a new config variable CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR, 
> which defaults disabled.  This is a debugging feature, not something 
> that non-kernel-hackers would be expected to care about.  This feature 
> can detect looping CPUs in !PREEMPT builds and looping CPUs with 
> preemption disabled in PREEMPT builds.  This is essentially a port of 
> this functionality from the treercu patch.
> 
> One current shortcoming: on some systems, stalls are detected during 
> early boot, when we normally would not care about them.  My thought is 
> to add a call from late initialization to suppress stall detection 
> until the system is well along its way to being booted, but thought I 
> should check to see if there might already be something for this 
> purpose.

could you be a bit more specific, why do those warnings show up and why 
dont we care about them? There are things like networking that 
occasionally do an rcu_sync() and a stall could mean a bootup hang.

> (Currently against 2.6.27-rc8, FYI.)
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

i think this is a very good idea in general - often the question comes 
up whether a hang seen in the RCU code is indeed caused by RCU or other 
factors. Could you perhaps rebase it against tip/core/rcu ? [or 
tip/master for convenience]

	Ingo