From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:12:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081002081231.GC17695@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081001191945.4182d0be@redhat.com>
* Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
>
> x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time
>
> The default number of additional CPU IDs for hotplugging is determined
> by asking ACPI or mptables how many "disabled" CPUs there are in the
> system, but many systems get this wrong so that e.g. a uniprocessor
> machine gets an extra CPU allocated and never switches to single CPU
> mode.
>
> And sometimes CPU hotplugging is enabled only for suspend/hibernate
> anyway, so the additional CPU IDs are not wanted. Allow the number to
> be set to zero at compile time.
>
> Also, force the number of extra CPUs to zero if hotplugging is
> disabled which allows removing some conditional code.
>
> Tested on uniprocessor x86_64 that ACPI claims has a disabled
> processor, with CPU hotplugging configured.
>
> ("After" has the number of additional CPUs set to 0)
> Before: NR_CPUS: 512, nr_cpu_ids: 2, nr_node_ids 1
> After: NR_CPUS: 512, nr_cpu_ids: 1, nr_node_ids 1
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
hm, wouldnt this option kill 'real' hot-plug CPUs (how rare they might
be) which are properly enumerated in the BIOS tables?
i dont mind having a facility to disable real CPU hotplug, but the
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ADDITIONAL_CPUS does not spell that out clearly
IMO. Something like CONFIG_HOTPLUG_RESTRICT_TO_BOOTUP_CPUS=y would be
more appropriately named i think?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-02 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 23:19 Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-10-02 19:30 ` [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time, V2 Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 19:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 19:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-02 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 9:12 ` [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time Andi Kleen
2008-10-02 19:25 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-02 20:09 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 20:40 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-04 16:52 ` <PING> " Andi Kleen
2008-10-04 22:30 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-05 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-05 14:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-05 15:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-05 20:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-05 21:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 22:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-05 20:28 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081002081231.GC17695@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome