From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081002204018.GD8318@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081002160907.68d79e0b@redhat.com>
> The prefix rewriting doesn't happen unless I boot with additional_cpus=0,
> maxcpus=1, or with this patch applied and the config option set. I think
> the rules for when/if the rewriting happens changed a while ago to avoid
> multiple switches and now it's not happening at all on this machine by
> default.
Well then something is broken, but the fix is not to lower num_possible_cpus(),
but to fix the root cause.
Does the appended patch help?
> Oh, and with NR_CPUS=512 I am seeing 1.6MB per-cpu data (I'll have to
> check that, but I remember being surprised at how big the number was.)
How did you measure? And you mean total right? If it's total
then it's ~32KB/CPU which is roughly similar to my 40k number
(probably depends on CONFIG options)
The standard way is __per_cpu_start - __per_cpu_end (on 64bit;
or the other way round on 32bit). That segment is duplicated
per CPU. Ok there are some dynamic data structures that scale too,
so it's possible a little more.
Single per cpu data should not scale with NR_CPUS, but be constant.
-Andi
---
Take disabled cpus into account in alternative.c
Otherwise an UP system with one hotplug CPU will not
go into UP mode.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Index: linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc.orig/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ void __init alternative_instructions(voi
_text, _etext);
/* Only switch to UP mode if we don't immediately boot others */
- if (num_possible_cpus() == 1 || setup_max_cpus <= 1)
+ if (num_possible_cpus() - additional_cpus == 1 || setup_max_cpus <= 1)
alternatives_smp_switch(0);
}
#endif
Index: linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc.orig/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu)
cpu_clear(cpu, cpu_sibling_setup_map);
}
-static int additional_cpus __initdata = -1;
+int additional_cpus = -1;
static __init int setup_additional_cpus(char *s)
{
Index: linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc/include/asm-x86/smp.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc.orig/include/asm-x86/smp.h
+++ linux-2.6.27-rc4-misc/include/asm-x86/smp.h
@@ -204,5 +204,7 @@ static inline int hard_smp_processor_id(
extern void cpu_uninit(void);
#endif
+extern int additional_cpus;
+
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
#endif
--
ak@linux.intel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-02 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 23:19 Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 19:30 ` [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time, V2 Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 19:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 19:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-10-02 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-02 9:12 ` [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additional hotplug CPUs to be set at compile time Andi Kleen
2008-10-02 19:25 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-02 20:09 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-02 20:40 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-10-04 16:52 ` <PING> " Andi Kleen
2008-10-04 22:30 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-05 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-05 14:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-05 15:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-05 20:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-05 21:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-05 22:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-05 20:28 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081002204018.GD8318@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome