From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, tglx@linuxtronix.de
Subject: Re: RCU hang on cpu re-hotplug with 2.6.27rc8
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:08:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081007030822.GC6820@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081006232837.GA1157@basil.nowhere.org>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 01:28:37AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> [modifying subject]
>
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:12:20PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > [Rafael, something for the regression list]
> >
> > While testing cpu hotunplug/hotreplug (first
> > setting two CPUs to offline and then to online again) on a 16 thread machine
> > with 2.6.27rc8 the first
> >
> > # echo 1 > ./devices/system/cpu/cpu14/online
> >
> > after hotunplug deadlocked somewhere in the scheduler:
>
> I let it run for longer and I ended up with more and more processes
> stuck in synchronize_rcu(). No more backtraces because the system
> has no console and is now not able to write to disk anymore.
>
> So it seems like there's something broken with RCU & cpu hotplug
> in 2.6.28rc8. cc Paul.
>
> It's probably not the scheduler, sorry for blaming it earlier.
Could you please try the patch at the following URL (from Thomas
Gleixner)?
http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/patches/2.6.27-rc7-tglx-timer-1.patch
This fixed some CPU hotplug hangs that I was seeing in 2.6.27-rc7 and
-rc8. Alternatively, try 2.6.27-rc9, which seems to include Thomas's
patch.
Thanx, Paul
> -Andi
>
> > bash D 00000000ffffcb5b 0 4683 4671
> > ffff8804bc583c68 0000000000000086 ffff8804bc9d8640 0000000000000296
> > ffff8804bdd34730 ffff8804be6fc090 ffff8804bdd34978 0000000c805a1e2a
> > ffff8804be4fd780 ffffffff802298b4 ffffffff808acd98 ffff88027d0b1168
> > Call Trace:
> > [<ffffffff802298b4>] __dequeue_entity+0x25/0x68
> > [<ffffffff805a1b4b>] schedule_timeout+0x1e/0xad
> > [<ffffffff8022a11f>] __disable_runtime+0x57/0x155
> > [<ffffffff8025cc47>] cpupri_set+0xbe/0xcd
> > [<ffffffff805a19b3>] wait_for_common+0xcd/0x131
> > [<ffffffff8022c918>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xe
> > [<ffffffff80241f3a>] synchronize_rcu+0x30/0x36
> > [<ffffffff80241fac>] wakeme_after_rcu+0x0/0xc
> > [<ffffffff8022dab6>] partition_sched_domains+0x9b/0x1dd
> > [<ffffffff8022dc26>] update_sched_domains+0x2e/0x35
> > [<ffffffff805a5297>] notifier_call_chain+0x29/0x4c
> > [<ffffffff8059ef76>] _cpu_up+0xd0/0x10a
> > [<ffffffff8059f004>] cpu_up+0x54/0x61
> > [<ffffffff805837d5>] store_online+0x43/0x67
> > [<ffffffff802c51e9>] sysfs_write_file+0xd2/0x110
> > [<ffffffff8028656b>] vfs_write+0xad/0x136
> > [<ffffffff802869f3>] sys_write+0x45/0x6e
> > [<ffffffff8020b22b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> >
> > It just hung forever, but the machine was otherwise fully functional.
> >
> > This was without frame pointers so the backtrace presumably has
> > some garbage. Haven't looked too closely.
> >
> > -Andi
> >
> > --
> > ak@linux.intel.com
>
> --
> ak@linux.intel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-07 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-06 14:12 scheduler " Andi Kleen
2008-10-06 23:28 ` RCU " Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 3:08 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2008-10-07 7:15 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 15:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 15:49 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-07 21:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-07 21:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 1:08 ` [PATCH] rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 6:20 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-09 6:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-09 7:05 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-09 7:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-09 7:26 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-09 8:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-10 11:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 11:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 11:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 10:23 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-10-09 10:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-09 11:44 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-10-09 11:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 13:01 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2008-10-10 3:44 ` [PATCH] v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-13 23:09 ` [PATCH] v3 " Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-14 3:53 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-14 14:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-23 11:12 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-26 21:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-27 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-27 23:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-29 1:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-29 1:31 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-10-30 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 1:33 ` RCU hang on cpu re-hotplug with 2.6.27rc8 Paul E. McKenney
2008-10-09 4:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-09 7:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-10-09 8:22 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-09 11:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081007030822.GC6820@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linuxtronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome