From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:22:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081123212231.63cc02d6.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081122064132.GA6196@suse.de>
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:41:32 -0800, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
> > > > This reverts to the 2005 (pre- aafbf24a) behaviour where "nousb" was
> > > > not a module parameter, just a kernel command line parameter. That's
> > > > more sensible anyway.
By the way, I floated the idea to remove "nousb" altogether on fedora-devel.
Alan Cox replied that he has an actual box that requires it,
because of a bug in SMM BIOS... Imagine my surprise. I think we're
stuck with "nousb" for a little while still.
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-24 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20081121141913.90d05091.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
[not found] ` <200811212128.52317.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
[not found] ` <20081121183403.GC16353@suse.de>
2008-11-22 2:31 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-22 6:41 ` Greg KH
2008-11-22 17:29 ` Pete Zaitcev
2008-11-24 4:11 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-24 4:08 ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-24 4:22 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2009-06-09 10:12 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-10 7:26 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-10 8:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-11 9:07 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-11 13:08 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-15 6:40 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-15 7:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-15 8:52 ` David Miller
2009-06-15 10:39 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-23 6:14 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-24 3:24 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-24 6:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-03 3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-03 17:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-08-03 20:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-08-03 23:18 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-10 3:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-10 3:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-09 3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-09 14:32 ` Siarhei Liakh
2009-09-11 3:00 ` Siarhei Liakh
2009-09-15 3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-22 5:15 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-11 3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-11 8:33 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-12 7:48 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 8:03 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 9:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-12 10:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-11 1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-14 4:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-15 3:52 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-15 4:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-17 22:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081123212231.63cc02d6.zaitcev@redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®