mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Xuxian Jiang <jiang@cs.ncsu.edu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:32:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <817ecb6f0909090732j6b1e097dobcb59af8147e30cf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090909134752.f5b8c2e7.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/module.c: In function 'set_section_ro_nx':
> kernel/module.c:1549: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_memory_ro'
> kernel/module.c:1560: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_memory_nx'
> kernel/module.c: In function 'unset_section_ro_nx':
> kernel/module.c:1575: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_memory_rw'
>
> Caused by commit 25306e21864c2a220d6fa2e0632425028aa9626c
> ("module:ro-nx-protection") which uses these interfaces that are only
> defined on x86 ...

Looks like I have made some bad assumptions. I will re-write the
original patch to be x86-only.

Sorry for breaking the build.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-09 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-09  3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-09 14:32 ` Siarhei Liakh [this message]
2009-09-11  3:00 ` Siarhei Liakh
2009-09-15  3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-22  5:15   ` Rusty Russell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-12-11  1:26 Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-14  4:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-15  3:52   ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-15  4:36     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-17 22:05     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12  8:03 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12  9:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-12 10:50   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12  7:48 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-11  3:01 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-11  8:33 ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-03  3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-03 17:55 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-08-03 20:22 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-08-03 23:18   ` Rusty Russell
2009-08-10  3:55     ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-10  3:56       ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-23  6:14 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-24  3:24 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-24  6:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-15  6:40 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-15  7:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-15  8:52   ` David Miller
2009-06-15 10:39 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-11  9:07 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-11 13:08 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-09 10:12 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-10  7:26 ` Rusty Russell
2009-06-10  8:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
     [not found] <20081121141913.90d05091.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
     [not found] ` <200811212128.52317.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
     [not found]   ` <20081121183403.GC16353@suse.de>
2008-11-22  2:31     ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-22  6:41       ` Greg KH
2008-11-22 17:29         ` Pete Zaitcev
2008-11-24  4:11           ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-24  4:08         ` Rusty Russell
2008-11-24  4:22         ` Pete Zaitcev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=817ecb6f0909090732j6b1e097dobcb59af8147e30cf@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sliakh.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jiang@cs.ncsu.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®