From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
To: Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>
Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdhci-devel@list.drzeus.cx,
fseidel@suse.de, weyland@library.ethz.ch,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:45:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126154552.6ec5ec47@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <492D604C.10707@overt.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1367 bytes --]
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:42:20 -0800
Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org> wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> >> The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
> >> model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
> >> primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.
> >
> > Note that the current separate ricoh_mmc disabling module approach has
> > been shown to break during suspend/resume. Matthew Garret proposed a
> > patch for that which (with minor fixups) I tested successfully.
>
> Hmm. Well, I'm interested as to what Pierre thinks. He explicitly didn't
> want a quirk when we originally looked at the problem and that's why
> ricoh_mmc exists - but maybe this is a good enough reason to revisit that
> decision.
>
Actually, what I didn't want was a _sdhci_ quirk. I'm fine with a PCI one. In fact,
that's probably the best approach as that register fiddling hides some
PCI devices, so it's best if it is done before enumeration.
(Side note: sdhci has now undergone the architectural change that would
allow a quirk like this, but the PCI version is probably still best)
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 8:42 Philip Langdale
2008-11-25 9:27 ` Mathias Weyland
2008-11-25 10:45 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-11-26 15:22 ` Frank Seidel
2008-11-26 13:36 ` Frans Pop
2008-11-26 14:42 ` Philip Langdale
2008-11-26 14:45 ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
2008-11-26 14:50 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-26 14:53 ` Philip Langdale
2008-11-26 15:12 ` Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081126154552.6ec5ec47@mjolnir.drzeus.cx \
--to=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=fseidel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=philipl@overt.org \
--cc=sdhci-devel@list.drzeus.cx \
--cc=weyland@library.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®