mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] sched: move double_unlock_balance() higher
@ 2008-11-28 19:08 Alexey Dobriyan
  2008-11-28 19:11 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Dobriyan @ 2008-11-28 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel

Move double_lock_balance()/double_unlock_balance() higher to fix the following
with gcc-3.4.6:

  CC      kernel/sched.o
In file included from kernel/sched.c:1605:
kernel/sched_rt.c: In function `find_lock_lowest_rq':
kernel/sched_rt.c:914: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'double_unlock_balance': function body not available
kernel/sched_rt.c:1077: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
make[2]: *** [kernel/sched.o] Error 1

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
---

 kernel/sched.c    |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 kernel/sched_rt.c |    4 ---
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1588,6 +1588,39 @@ static inline void update_shares_locked(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
 
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * double_lock_balance - lock the busiest runqueue, this_rq is locked already.
+ */
+static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
+	__releases(this_rq->lock)
+	__acquires(busiest->lock)
+	__acquires(this_rq->lock)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (unlikely(!irqs_disabled())) {
+		/* printk() doesn't work good under rq->lock */
+		spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+		BUG_ON(1);
+	}
+	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&busiest->lock))) {
+		if (busiest < this_rq) {
+			spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+			spin_lock(&busiest->lock);
+			spin_lock_nested(&this_rq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+			ret = 1;
+		} else
+			spin_lock_nested(&busiest->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
+	__releases(busiest->lock)
+{
+	spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
+	lock_set_subclass(&this_rq->lock.dep_map, 0, _RET_IP_);
+}
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
@@ -2788,40 +2821,6 @@ static void double_rq_unlock(struct rq *rq1, struct rq *rq2)
 }
 
 /*
- * double_lock_balance - lock the busiest runqueue, this_rq is locked already.
- */
-static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
-	__releases(this_rq->lock)
-	__acquires(busiest->lock)
-	__acquires(this_rq->lock)
-{
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (unlikely(!irqs_disabled())) {
-		/* printk() doesn't work good under rq->lock */
-		spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
-		BUG_ON(1);
-	}
-	if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&busiest->lock))) {
-		if (busiest < this_rq) {
-			spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
-			spin_lock(&busiest->lock);
-			spin_lock_nested(&this_rq->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
-			ret = 1;
-		} else
-			spin_lock_nested(&busiest->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
-	__releases(busiest->lock)
-{
-	spin_unlock(&busiest->lock);
-	lock_set_subclass(&this_rq->lock.dep_map, 0, _RET_IP_);
-}
-
-/*
  * If dest_cpu is allowed for this process, migrate the task to it.
  * This is accomplished by forcing the cpu_allowed mask to only
  * allow dest_cpu, which will force the cpu onto dest_cpu. Then
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -909,10 +909,6 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 /* Only try algorithms three times */
 #define RT_MAX_TRIES 3
 
-static int double_lock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest);
-static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq,
-						struct rq *busiest);
-
 static void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
 
 static int pick_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched: move double_unlock_balance() higher
  2008-11-28 19:08 [PATCH] sched: move double_unlock_balance() higher Alexey Dobriyan
@ 2008-11-28 19:11 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-11-28 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Dobriyan; +Cc: linux-kernel


* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:

> Move double_lock_balance()/double_unlock_balance() higher to fix the following
> with gcc-3.4.6:
> 
>   CC      kernel/sched.o
> In file included from kernel/sched.c:1605:
> kernel/sched_rt.c: In function `find_lock_lowest_rq':
> kernel/sched_rt.c:914: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'double_unlock_balance': function body not available
> kernel/sched_rt.c:1077: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> make[2]: *** [kernel/sched.o] Error 1
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
>  kernel/sched.c    |   67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  kernel/sched_rt.c |    4 ---
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

applied to tip/sched/core, thanks Alexey!

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-28 19:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-28 19:08 [PATCH] sched: move double_unlock_balance() higher Alexey Dobriyan
2008-11-28 19:11 ` Ingo Molnar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®