From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
khali@linux-fr.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:32:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081217213226.GA26832@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4948F56A.7020501@movial.fi>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:49:46PM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
> Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:27:56PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >>
> >> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and thus of
> >> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored, and is thus
> >> unnecessary. This patch removes the return value for the remove function
> >> stored in a platform_driver structure.
> >>
> >> For the files drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c and
> >> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c, the original return value was the value
> >> of a variable storing the result of calling i2c_del_adapter. I have thus
> >> also deleted the declaration and initialization of this variable. For the
> >> other files, the return values were always 0.
> >>
> >> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
> >> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
> >
> > I take it remove_new will eventually be renamed to remove once all
> > the changes have been made?
> >
> > Unless there are any objections I'll add this to the merge list for
> > the next window.
>
> Please be careful since the drivers/base/ part has not been applied
> yet, so I'm Cc:ing Greg now for his opinion.
The more I think about it, the more I think it should not be changed,
sorry. We should leave the return value and do something based on the
value of it if we can.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-17 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-10 16:27 Julia Lawall
2008-12-16 19:57 ` Ben Dooks
2008-12-17 12:49 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-12-17 21:32 ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-12-18 14:30 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081217213226.GA26832@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®